Objective To observe effect of LVIS stent-assisted spring-ring embolism treatment in patients with intracranial wide cervical aneurysm.
Methods A total of 130 patients with intracranial wide cervical aneurysms were divided into control group and observation group, with 65 cases in each group. The control group received spring-ring embolism treatment, while the observation group received LVIS stent-assisted spring-ring embolism treatment. The clinical effect of the two groups was compared, and the recurrence rate and incidence rate of recurrent responsible vascular stroke at 6 months of follow-up were compared as well.
Results The effective rate of embolization in observation group was 98.46%, which was significantly higher than 92.30% in control group (P < 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the rate of good prognosis and recurrence rate of disease in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There were 3 cases of recurrent responsible vascular stroke in the control group, but no such event was observed in the observation group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion LVIS stent-assisted spring-ring embolism treatment is effective in treating patients with intracranial wide cervical aneurysms, which can increase the success rate of embolism and reduce the recurrence rate.>
Objective To observe effect of LVIS stent-assisted spring-ring embolism treatment in patients with intracranial wide cervical aneurysm.
Methods A total of 130 patients with intracranial wide cervical aneurysms were divided into control group and observation group, with 65 cases in each group. The control group received spring-ring embolism treatment, while the observation group received LVIS stent-assisted spring-ring embolism treatment. The clinical effect of the two groups was compared, and the recurrence rate and incidence rate of recurrent responsible vascular stroke at 6 months of follow-up were compared as well.
Results The effective rate of embolization in observation group was 98.46%, which was significantly higher than 92.30% in control group (P < 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the rate of good prognosis and recurrence rate of disease in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There were 3 cases of recurrent responsible vascular stroke in the control group, but no such event was observed in the observation group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion LVIS stent-assisted spring-ring embolism treatment is effective in treating patients with intracranial wide cervical aneurysms, which can increase the success rate of embolism and reduce the recurrence rate.
DownLoad: