刘蕾, 何春渝, 杨嘉欣, 杜娟, 张海宇, 蒋艳萍, 李美好, 邱琦. 脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具的范围综述[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(2): 142-148. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232190
引用本文: 刘蕾, 何春渝, 杨嘉欣, 杜娟, 张海宇, 蒋艳萍, 李美好, 邱琦. 脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具的范围综述[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(2): 142-148. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232190
LIU Lei, HE Chunyu, YANG Jiaxin, DU Juan, ZHANG Haiyu, JIANG Yanping, LI Meihao, QIU Qi. Scoping review of frailty assessment tools for stroke patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(2): 142-148. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232190
Citation: LIU Lei, HE Chunyu, YANG Jiaxin, DU Juan, ZHANG Haiyu, JIANG Yanping, LI Meihao, QIU Qi. Scoping review of frailty assessment tools for stroke patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(2): 142-148. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232190

脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具的范围综述

Scoping review of frailty assessment tools for stroke patients

  • 摘要:
    目的 对现有脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具进行范围综述, 为脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具的选择提供参考。
    方法 系统化检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、SinoMed、万方、维普、知网数据库,检索时间为建库至2023年5月,筛选符合研究目的和研究问题的文献,并提取每篇文献的基本信息,包括第一作者、发表年份、发表国家、研究设计类型、评估工具名称、量表维度、条目数、评估时间等。
    结果 本研究共检索出1 729篇文献,经多重筛选后最终纳入22篇文献(共包含8种衰弱评估工具)。分析结果显示,8种衰弱评估工具的评估指标、评估时间和评估方法等各不相同,且各有优缺点,其中衰弱指数是最常用的脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具。选择有效的衰弱评估工具对脑卒中患者进行衰弱筛查,对加强卒中前风险分层和改善卒中后结局至关重要。
    结论 不同衰弱评估工具之间差异较大,且现有评估工具在衡量脑卒中患者衰弱方面均存在局限性,需结合临床医生的经验和判断进行综合评估。未来的研究需进一步深入探寻和开发新的衰弱评估工具,以更好地指导脑卒中患者的康复治疗和管理。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To provide a reference for the selection of frailty assessment tools for stroke patients by conducting a literature review of existing frailty assessment tools for stroke patients.
    Methods Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, SinoMed, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) databases from their inception to May 2023. The literature that met the research purpose and question were screened, and the basic information of each article, including the first author, publication year, country of publication, type of research design, name of the assessment tool, dimensions of scale, the number of items, and assessment time, was extracted.
    Results A total of 1, 729 articles were retrieved in this study. After multiple screenings, 22 articles (including 8 frailty assessment tools) were ultimately included. The analysis results showed that the evaluation indicators, evaluation time, and evaluation methods of the 8 frailty assessment tools were different and had their own advantages and disadvantages. Among them, the frailty index was the most commonly used frailty assessment tool for stroke patients. The selection of effective frailty assessment tools for stroke patients is essential for strengthening prestroke risk stratification and improving poststroke outcomes.
    Conclusion There are significant differences among different frailty assessment tools, and existing assessment tools have limitations in measuring frailty in stroke patients. Comprehensive assessments should be conducted in combination with clinicians' experience and judgment. New frailty assessment tools are needed in future research to better guide the rehabilitation treatment and management of stroke patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回