王小莉, 瞿航, 成维艳, 赵义, 蔡玉建, 王苇. X线影像组学在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的应用价值及3种模型效能比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(8): 21-24. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210555
引用本文: 王小莉, 瞿航, 成维艳, 赵义, 蔡玉建, 王苇. X线影像组学在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的应用价值及3种模型效能比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(8): 21-24. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210555
WANG Xiaoli, QU Hang, CHENG Weiyan, ZHAO Yi, CAI Yujian, WANG Wei. Application value of X-ray radiomics in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions and the efficacy comparison of three predictive models[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(8): 21-24. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210555
Citation: WANG Xiaoli, QU Hang, CHENG Weiyan, ZHAO Yi, CAI Yujian, WANG Wei. Application value of X-ray radiomics in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions and the efficacy comparison of three predictive models[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(8): 21-24. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210555

X线影像组学在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的应用价值及3种模型效能比较

Application value of X-ray radiomics in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions and the efficacy comparison of three predictive models

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨X线影像组学在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的应用价值,并比较3种预测模型的效能。
      方法  回顾性分析296例乳腺病变患者的临床资料,包括恶性病变149例,良性病变147例。对病变头足位(CC)及内外斜位(MLO)的感兴趣区(ROI)进行手动分隔并最终提取影像组学特征,采用支持向量机(SVM)、逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)进行分类学习,最后运用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)比较不同模型的效能。
      结果  经过特征筛选最后共纳入9个最优特征,分别为形态特征(球形、长轴长度)、一阶特征(均匀性、均值绝对偏差)和高阶特征灰度级大小区域矩阵(大面积低灰度比)、相邻灰度色调差矩阵(强度)、灰度共生矩阵(对比度、集聚突变、群集趋势)。SVM、LR、RF诊断效能的AUC分别为0.820、0.758、0.805。SVM与LR的AUC值比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
      结论  影像组学特征中一阶特征和高阶特征是由计算机分析提取,其中对比度、集聚突变、群集趋势均描述图像纹理粗糙程度,能更好地反映乳腺肿瘤的异质性,能够提高诊断的准确度、特异度。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore application value of X-ray radiomics in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions, and to compare performance of three predictive models.
      Methods  The clinical data of 296 patients with breast lesions was retrospectively analyzed, including 149 cases of malignant lesions and 134 cases of benign lesions. The regions of interest (ROI) of lesions on X-ray images of the craniocaudal (CC) position and the mediolateral oblique (MLO) position were manually separated, radiomics features were extracted and inputted into the machine. Supporting vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) were conducted for classification learning. Finally, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to calculate the area under curve (AUC) and to compare the performance of different models.
      Results  After feature screening, a total of 9 optimal features were selected, including morphological characteristics(sphericity and major axis length), first-order radiomics features (uniformity and mean absolute deviation), and the high-order radiomics featuresgrey level size zone matrix features(large area low gray level emphasis strength contrast), gray level run length matrix features(intensity) and gray level co-occurrence matrix(contrast, cluster prominence, cluster tendency). The AUC of SVM, LR, RF was 0.820, 0.758, and 0.805, respectively. The difference in AUC between SVM and LR was statistically significant(P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Radiomics features including first-order radiomics features and high-order radiomics features are extracted by computer analysis. Among them, contrast, cluster prominence, cluster tendency can depict roughness of image texture, better reflect the heterogeneity of breast tumor, and improve the diagnostic accuracy and specificity.

     

/

返回文章
返回