吕华伟, 严春霞, 沈冬明. 4种肿瘤标志物联合检测诊断肺癌的价值分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(14): 45-47,52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202014012
引用本文: 吕华伟, 严春霞, 沈冬明. 4种肿瘤标志物联合检测诊断肺癌的价值分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(14): 45-47,52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202014012
LYU Huawei, YAN Chunxia, SHEN Dongming. Value of combined detection of four tumor markers in diagnosis of patients with lung cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(14): 45-47,52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202014012
Citation: LYU Huawei, YAN Chunxia, SHEN Dongming. Value of combined detection of four tumor markers in diagnosis of patients with lung cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(14): 45-47,52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202014012

4种肿瘤标志物联合检测诊断肺癌的价值分析

Value of combined detection of four tumor markers in diagnosis of patients with lung cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖类抗原125(CA125)联合神经特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)检测诊断肺癌的价值。 方法 将病理确诊的48例肺癌患者和40例肺部良性病变患者分别为肺癌组和良性病变组,另选取同期门诊常规体检的35名健康人设为健康组。比较3组受试者血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125和NSE水平,分析CEA、CA19-9、CA125和NSE联合检测诊断肺癌的敏感度、特异度和准确度。 结果 肺癌组血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、NSE水平均显著高于良性病变组和健康组(P<0.05)。TNM Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、NSE水平均显著高于TNM Ⅰ~Ⅱ期患者(P<0.05)。血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、NSE联合检测诊断肺癌的敏感度、准确度均显著高于各指标单项检测(P<0.05), 而联合检测与单项检测的特异度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、NSE联合检测诊断肺癌的敏感度、准确度均较高,可为临床筛查、诊断提供可靠依据。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125)and neuro-specific enolase(NSE)in diagnosis of patients with lung cancer. Methods Totally 48 patients with diagnosed lung cancer and 40 patients with benign lung disease were selected and designed as lung cancer group and benign lung disease group respectively, and 35 healthy people with routine physical examination in outpatient department at the same time period were selected as healthy group. The serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and NSE were compared among the three groups, and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of combined detection of CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and NSE in the diagnosis of lung cancer were analyzed. Results The serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and NSE in the lung cancer group were significantly higher than those in the benign lung disease group and the healthy group(P<0.05). The levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and NSE in patients in stage Ⅲ to Ⅳ of TNM were significantly higher than those in patients with stage Ⅰ to Ⅱ of TNM(P<0.05). The sensitivity and accuracy of combined detection of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and NSE in the diagnosis of lung cancer were significantly higher than those of single detection(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in specificity between the combined detection and single detection(P>0.05). Conclusion The sensitivity and accuracy of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and NSE are high in the diagnosis of patients with lung cancer, which can provide reliable references for clinical screening and diagnosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回