李菡, 周志刚. 无创正压通气联合呼吸兴奋剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺性脑病的效果观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(7): 68-71. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201907018
引用本文: 李菡, 周志刚. 无创正压通气联合呼吸兴奋剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺性脑病的效果观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(7): 68-71. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201907018
LI Han, ZHOU Zhigang. Efficiency observation of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation combined with respiratory stimulants in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients complicated with pulmonary encephalopathy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(7): 68-71. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201907018
Citation: LI Han, ZHOU Zhigang. Efficiency observation of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation combined with respiratory stimulants in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients complicated with pulmonary encephalopathy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(7): 68-71. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201907018

无创正压通气联合呼吸兴奋剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺性脑病的效果观察

Efficiency observation of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation combined with respiratory stimulants in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients complicated with pulmonary encephalopathy

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨无创正压通气(BiPAP)联合呼吸兴奋剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并肺性脑病的效果。
      方法  选取COPD合并肺性脑病患者84例, 随机分为对照组与研究组各42例。2组均采取常规对症支持治疗,对照组应用BiPAP呼吸机进行辅助通气治疗,研究组在对照组基础上应用呼吸兴奋剂治疗。比较2组治疗前后动脉血气指标与炎症指标的变化,治疗后格拉斯哥昏迷(GCS)评分、通气时间、住院时间,以及气管插管率与病死率。
      结果  研究组治疗后动脉血二氧化碳分压显著低于对照组(P < 0.05), 动脉血氧分压显著高于对照组(P < 0.05), pH值无显著差异(P>0.05)。研究组治疗后白介素-10(IL-10)、白介素-8(IL-8)与白介素-6(IL-6)显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。研究组治疗后GCS评分显著高于对照组(P < 0.05), 通气时间、住院时间均显著短于对照组(P < 0.05)。2组气管插管率与病死率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
      结论  BiPAP联合呼吸兴奋剂治疗COPD合并肺性脑病疗效确切,可以有效纠正患者动脉血气与炎症指标,缩短通气时间,促进患者康复。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To investigate the effect of bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) combined with respiratory stimulants in treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients complicated with pulmonary encephalopathy.
      Methods  A total of 84 COPD patients complicated with pulmonary encephalopathy were selected and randomly divided into control group and study group, with 42 cases in each group. Both groups were treated with routine symptomatic support therapy, while the control group was treated with BiPAP ventilator, and the study group was treated with respiratory stimulants on the basis of control group. The changes of arterial blood gas indexes and inflammation indexes before and after treatment, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), ventilation time, hospitalization time, tracheal intubation rate and mortality were compared between the two groups.
      Results  After treatment, the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05), the arterial partial pressure of oxygen was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the pH value showed no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-8 and IL-6 in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the GCS score in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and ventilation time and hospitalization time were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the rate of tracheal intubation and mortality between the two groups (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  BiPAP combined with respiratory stimulants is effective in the treatment of COPD complicated with pulmonary encephalopathy, which can effectively correct arterial blood gas indexes and inflammation indexes, shorten ventilation time and promote rehabilitation.

     

/

返回文章
返回