ZHANG Xiaoli, TIAN Chunyan. Risk factors of preeclampsia complicated with renal impairment and construction of prediction model[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(6): 99-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20244086
Citation: ZHANG Xiaoli, TIAN Chunyan. Risk factors of preeclampsia complicated with renal impairment and construction of prediction model[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(6): 99-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20244086

Risk factors of preeclampsia complicated with renal impairment and construction of prediction model

More Information
  • Received Date: September 06, 2024
  • Revised Date: December 23, 2024
  • Objective 

    To analyze the influencing factors of preeclampsia (PE) complicated with renal impairment and construct a prediction model.

    Methods 

    The clinical materials of 300 PE patients with antenatal examination in the hospital from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected and divided into modeling set of 200 cases and validation set of 100 cases by a random number table in a ratio of 2 to 1. All the patients were followed up for 3 months after delivery. Patients in the modeling set with renal impairment were included in occurrence group, and the rest were included in non-occurrence group. Clinical materials between the modeling set and the validation set as well as between the occurrence group and the non-occurrence group within the modeling set were compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the influencing factors of renal impairment in PE and construct a prediction model. The model performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

    Results 

    There was no significant difference in clinical data between the modeling set and validation set (P>0.05). After completion of follow-up for 300 PE patients, renal impairment occurred in 75 cases (25.00%), including 24 cases (24.00%) in the validation set and 51 cases (25.50%) in the modeling set. A total of 51 patients with renal impairment in the modeling set were included in the occurrence group, and the remaining 149 patients were included in the non-occurrence group. Compared with the non-occurrence group, the occurrence group had significant older age, higher proportions of HELLP syndrome, early-onset PE and severe manifestations of PE, increased systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, resistance index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) of renal interlobar artery as well as decreased peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of renal interlobar artery and platelet (PLT) (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, HELLP syndrome, early-onset of PE, severe manifestations of PE, and RI of renal interlobar artery were influencing factors of renal impairment in PE (P < 0.05). A prediction model for renal impairment in PE was established based on the results of Logistic regression analysis in the modeling set. The area under the curve (AUC) of this model for predicting renal impairment was 0.949 (95%CI, 0.917 to 0.971) in the modeling set and 0.944 (95%CI, 0.900 to 0.972) in the validation set. Calibration curves for the modeling set and validation set were plotted, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed no significant differences (P>0.05). Internal validation by the Bootstrap method showed consistency index was 0.913 (95%CI, 0.828 to 0.998) for the modeling set and 0.907 (95%CI, 0.840 to 0.974) for the validation set. According to DCA, the clinical net benefit of the prediction model was obtained at risk thresholds of 0.13 to 0.92 for the modeling set and 0.18 to 0.87 for the validation set.

    Conclusion 

    The influencing factors of renal impairment in PE include age, HELLP syndrome, early-onset of PE, severe manifestations of PE, and RI of renal interlobar artery. The prediction model established based on these factors demonstrates good performance in predicting renal impairment in PE, providing evidences for clinical assessment of renal impairment risk in PE.

  • [1]
    ROCHA G. Consequences of early-onset preeclampsia on neonatal morbidity and mortality[J]. Minerva Pediatr, 2023, 75(1): 87-97.
    [2]
    CHAPPELL L C, CLUVER C A, KINGDOM J, et al. Pre-eclampsia[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10297): 341-354.
    [3]
    戴鑫伟, 朱利平, 汪云. 子痫前期和慢性高血压并发子痫前期的临床特点及母儿结局[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2022, 33(9): 64-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2022.09.011
    [4]
    VILLALAÍN GONZÁLEZ C, HERRAIZ GARCÍA I, FERNÁNDEZ-FRIERA L, et al. Cardiovascular and renal health: Preeclampsia as a risk marker[J]. Nefrologia, 2023, 43(3): 269-280.
    [5]
    中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(4): 227-238.
    [6]
    王铖, 桑婉玥, 吕忠英, 等. 脉搏波传导速度与中青年原发性高血压患者早期肾损害的相关性及诊断价值[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2020, 28(1): 44-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3949.2020.01.009
    [7]
    OVERTON E, TOBES D, LEE A. Preeclampsia diagnosis and management[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2022, 36(1): 107-121.
    [8]
    毕新颖, 卢勇, 贾立杨, 等. 氧化应激指标联合子宫动脉血流动力学参数对妊娠期高血压疾病的预测效能[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(4): 45-49. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20233320
    [9]
    陈思宇, 白兰, 周宇. 子痫前期患者不规则趋化因子表达及其与血清炎症因子水平和妊娠结局的关系[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(16): 84-88. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20230192
    [10]
    赵静, 毛小梅. 子痫前期患者外周血中TLR-4、HMGB1的表达水平及其对肾损伤的诊断价值[J]. 医学临床研究, 2022, 39(10): 1501-1504, 1508. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.10.017
    [11]
    SAMEJIMA T, YAMASHITA T, TAKEDA Y, et al. Low antithrombin levels accompanied by high urine protein/creatinine ratios are predictive of acute kidney injury among CS patients with preeclampsia[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2021, 34(10): 1550-1556.
    [12]
    李引弟, 宋渊丽, 李雪峰. 血清肝细胞生长因子和富亮氨酸α2糖蛋白1水平与子痫前期及急性肾损伤的相关性分析[J]. 中国医药, 2023, 18(4): 555-559.
    [13]
    PALMRICH P, BINDER C, ZEISLER H, et al. Awareness of obstetricians for long-term risks in women with a history of preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 305(3): 581-587.
    [14]
    卞显凤. 轻度子痫前期孕妇甲状腺功能减退与肾损伤的相关性[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2022, 30(6): 1331-1334, 1339.
    [15]
    CORREA-DE-ARAUJO R, YOON S S S. Clinical outcomes in high-risk pregnancies due to advanced maternal age[J]. J Womens Health, 2021, 30(2): 160-167.
    [16]
    LI B Y, YANG H X. Comparison of clinical features and pregnancy outcomes in early- and late-onset preeclampsia with HELLP syndrome: a 10-year retrospective study from a tertiary hospital and referral center in China[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1): 186. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04466-9
    [17]
    CHEWCHARAT A, KATTAH A G, THONGPRAYOON C, et al. Comparison of hospitalization outcomes for delivery and resource utilization between pregnant women with kidney transplants and chronic kidney disease in the United States[J]. Nephrology, 2021, 26(11): 879-889.
    [18]
    于璐, 徐晓英. 高龄孕妇早发型重度子痫前期不良结局列线图模型的构建及验证[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(11): 43-48, 79. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20223517
    [19]
    SALEHI M G, SHOBEIRI E, NALEINI F, et al. Diagnostic value of Doppler ultrasound indices of maternal renal interlobar vasculature in the prediction of preeclampsia[J]. J Med Life, 2021, 14(2): 277-283.
    [20]
    毕大磊, 郅树升. 老年腹股沟疝腹腔镜术后复发的因素分析及风险预测可视化模型构建[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2024, 26(3): 25-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463.2024.03.005
    [21]
    陈双, 雷海科, 唐鑫怡, 等. 基于外周血炎症指标的重症成人社区获得性肺炎预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2024, 45(3): 282-288. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2024.03.006
  • Related Articles

    [1]YAN Shanshan, WANG Ya, YAO Dongfang. Development of a risk prediction model for dialysis disequilibrium syndrome in hemodialysis patients based on decision tree algorithm[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(18): 51-55, 61. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242224
    [2]XING Dongmei, SUI Bingbing, WANG Lei. Establishment and validation of risk prediction model for mortality in elderly patients with sepsis during hospitalization[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(8): 39-44. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233722
    [3]WANG Aihua, WANG Yonghua, CHEN Juan, YANG Juan, JIANG Lingli, GONG Yan. Research progress on risk prediction models for enteral nutrition-associated diarrhea[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(14): 137-142. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231906
    [4]REN Yuanyuan, DING Fu, XU Zhihui, FU Rongjuan. Research status of fall risk prediction models for inpatients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(8): 144-148. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230036
    [5]ZHANG Qiu, SUN Ling, WANG Qingjie, JI Yuan, JIANG Jianguang. Value of growth differentiation factor-15 in predicting risk of acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(16): 15-18. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202016004
    [6]XIE Yan, ZHOU Haiying, TIAN Ran, SUN Mili, WU Yunying, DU Chunping. Effect of risk management in improvement of self-efficacy level of elderly stroke patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (2): 15-18. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201802005
    [7]ZHAO Lin. Application of risk nursing intervention in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in Intensive Care Unit[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (18): 46-48. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201618015
    [8]ZHAO Yan, JIAO Fengjun, SHI Dawei. Risk analysis of nosocomial infections occurred in emergency nursing and its nursing countermeasures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (2): 76-79. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201602024
    [9]LIU Yanyin, YANG Kun. Effect of risk nursing for nosocomial infection control[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (16): 184-186. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201516064
    [10]LI Heng, YANG Chengjian. Current situation and prospect of risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome patients with non-ST segment elevation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (3): 143-146. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201403051
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 郭云. 麻黄汤合止嗽散加减联合常规治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者的临床疗效分析. 中国医药指南. 2024(09): 135-137 .
    2. 张靖琨,陈兴慧,宋雪红,杨健伟,徐新松. 益肺化痰定喘汤加减结合西药治疗老年AECOPD对患者肺功能及气道黏液高分泌的影响. 现代中医药. 2024(03): 68-72 .
    3. 陆薇. 穴位埋线联合茚达特罗/格隆溴铵对肺肾气虚型慢性阻塞性肺疾病的应用与研究. 中国医药科学. 2024(08): 82-85 .
    4. 叶迎春,周亮,占中英. 升陷汤辅助治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的临床观察. 现代诊断与治疗. 2023(01): 27-29 .
    5. 刘方,刁素梅,严瑾,孙琴. 火龙罐辅治慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性发作期临床观察. 实用中医药杂志. 2023(09): 1793-1794 .
    6. 贺小举. 桑菊清解汤联合穴位敷贴对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期痰热蕴肺证患者中医证候的影响. 中国实用医刊. 2023(18): 120-123 .
    7. 李炬明. 补中益气汤加减联合沙美特罗替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者的临床研究. 实用中西医结合临床. 2022(13): 44-46 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (16) PDF downloads (1) Cited by(9)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return