| Citation: |
ZHOU Yan, ZOU Jiajia, LIU Zhao, LI Xiaoqiang, WENG Yanmin. Risk factors of occurrence of complications after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair for complex thoracoabdominal aortic diseases[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(22): 1-7, 15. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243702
|
To analyze the risk factors of occurrence of complications after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) for complex thoracoabdominal aortic diseases.
Clinical materials of 147 patients with F/B-EVAR for thoracoabdominal aortic diseases in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Nanjing University from 2021 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate correlation analysis was used to explore the risk factors for postoperative complications during the mid-term follow-up.
There were 13 postoperative deaths, with a mortality rate of 8.8%; 52 patients experienced overall surgery-related complications, with an incidence rate of 35.4%; 31 patients had postoperative endoleaks, with an endoleak rate of 21.1%; 14 patients had branch stent-related endoleaks, involving 14 branches; and 4 patients had branch occlusion, involving 5 branches. The re-intervention rate in this study was 20.4% (30/147), with 20 cases (13.6%) of postoperative renal insufficiency and 1 case of postoperative paraplegia due to spinal cord ischemia, as well as 1 case of postoperative stent infection. Risk factor analysis for postoperative mortality, overall complications, endoleaks, and postoperative renal failure was conducted, and the risk factors for overall complications included preoperative renal insufficiency, aortic disease, aortic tortuosity angle >60 °, and average number of branch reconstructions. The independent influencing factors for postoperative endoleaks included gender, age, history of renal insufficiency, history of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), aortic tortuosity angle >60°, and true lumen diameter in thoracoabdominal aortic dissection (TAAD). The independent influencing factor for postoperative renal failure was preoperative renal insufficiency.
Female, age, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA), history of renal insufficiency, history of TEVAR, aortic tortuosity angle >60°, and true lumen diameter in TAAD are the influencing factors for postoperative complications in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic diseases, and the possible related factors are TAAA sac diameter and TAAD false lumen diameter.
| [1] |
LOMBARDI J V, HUGHES G C, APPOO J J, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 71(3): 723-747. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.013
|
| [2] |
ALFSON D B, HAM S W. Type B aortic dissections: current guidelines for treatment[J]. Cardiol Clin, 2017, 35(3): 387-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2017.03.007
|
| [3] |
WANHAINEN A, VAN HERZEELE I, BASTOS GONCALVES F, et al. Editor's choice: European society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2024 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2024, 67(2): 192-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002
|
| [4] |
COLGAN F E, BUNGAY P M, BURFITT N, et al. Operative and 1-year outcomes of the custom-made fenestrated anaconda aortic stent graft-a UK multicenter study[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2018, 46: 257-264. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.027
|
| [5] |
KESKIN H A, KURTUL A, ESENBOGA K, et al. Prognostic nutritional index predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection[J]. Perfusion, 2021, 36(7): 710-716. doi: 10.1177/0267659120961937
|
| [6] |
刘晓博, 霍静, 吴忠隐, 等. 胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗急性B型主动脉夹层患者发生围手术期并发症的影响因素分析[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志, 2024, 10(2): 148-151, 179.
|
| [7] |
KIM H J, JO E A, PARK H S, et al. Midterm outcomes of physician-modified endovascular stent grafts for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms in Korea: a retrospective study[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2024, 106(2): 106-114. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.2.106
|
| [8] |
ODERICH G S, FATIMA J, GLOVICZKI P. Stent graft modification with mini-cuff reinforced fenestrations for urgent repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 54(5): 1522-1526. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.023
|
| [9] |
TAHER F, FALKENSAMMER J, MCCARTE J, et al. The influence of prototype testing in three-dimensional aortic models on fenestrated endograft design[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2017, 65(6): 1591-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.108
|
| [10] |
HAUCK S R, KUPFERTHALER A, KERN M, et al. Branched versus fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the aortic arch: a multicenter comparison[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2022, 164(5): 1379-1389, e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.03.023
|
| [11] |
PATEL R, SWEETING M J, POWELL J T, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1(EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10058): 2366-2374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31135-7
|
| [12] |
LEDERLE F A, KYRIAKIDES T C, STROUPE K T, et al. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(22): 2126-2135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715955
|
| [13] |
RAMKUMAR N, GOODNEY P P, CRONENWETT J L. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 381(11): e24.
|
| [14] |
TENORIO E R, ODERICH G S, SANDRI G A, et al. Prospective nonrandomized study to evaluate cone beam computed tomography for technical assessment of standard and complex endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 71(6): 1982-1993, e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.080
|
| [15] |
SUGIMOTO M, PANUCCIO G, BISDAS T, et al. Tortuosity is the significant predictive factor for renal branch occlusion after branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2016, 51(3): 350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.09.013
|
| [16] |
NIET A D, POST R B, REIJNEN M M P J, et al. Geometric changes over time in bridging stents after branched and fenestrated endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aneurysm[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2019, 70(3): 702-709. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.12.023
|
| [17] |
SILVERBERG D, ABURAMILEH A, RIMON U, et al. Secondary interventions after fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 72(3): 866-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.068
|
| [18] |
朱杰昌, 戴向晨, 罗宇东, 等. 体外开窗腔内主动脉修复术治疗胸腹主动脉病变的早期结果分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(12): 921-925. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.12.009
|
| [19] |
CHAIT J, TENORIO E R, MENDES B C, et al. Impact of gap distance between fenestration and aortic wall on target artery instability following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2022, 76(1): 79-87, e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.135
|
| [20] |
ANTONIOU G A, JUSZCZAK M T, ANTONIOU S A, et al. Editor's choice- fenestrated or branched endovascular versus open repair for complex aortic aneurysms: meta-analysis of time to event propensity score matched data[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2021, 61(2): 228-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.10.010
|
| [21] |
ULLERY B W, SUH G Y, LEE J T, et al. Geometry and respiratory-induced deformation of abdominal branch vessels and stents after complex endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2015, 61(4): 875-884. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.075
|
| [22] |
MASTRACCI T M, CARRELL T, CONSTANTINOU J, et al. Editor's choice- effect of branch stent choice on branch-related outcomes in complex aortic repair[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2016, 51(4): 536-542. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.12.046
|
| [23] |
中国微循环学会周围血管疾病专业委员会. 胸腹主动脉瘤内脏动脉分支重建专家共识[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志, 2023, 9(4): 385-394.
|
| [24] |
ZIPFEL B, BUZ S, REDLIN M, et al. Spinal cord ischemia after thoracic stent-grafting: causes apart from intercostal artery coverage[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 96(1): 31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.010
|
| [25] |
ZOLI S, RODER F, ETZ C D, et al. Predicting the risk of paraplegia after thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 90(4): 1237-1244;discussion1245. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.091
|
| [26] |
MAIER S, MORLOCK J, BENK C, et al. Impact of intermittent functional internal iliac artery occlusion on spinal cord blood supply during TEVAR[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 68(4): 315-321. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688474
|
| [27] |
PINI R, FAGGIOLI G, PARASKEVAS K I, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the occurrence of spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2022, 75(4): 1466-1477, e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.015
|
| 1. |
李巧. 卡维地洛联合缬沙坦治疗重症慢性心力衰竭患者的效果. 中国民康医学. 2022(07): 35-37+41 .
| |
| 2. |
刘朋，李山，郭艳丽. 卡维地洛和美托洛尔治疗老年慢性心力衰竭的疗效及对血清脑钠肽水平的影响研究. 贵州医药. 2022(06): 925-926 .
| |
| 3. |
辛丽，刘永慧，张明吉. 沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠对慢性心力衰竭患者心室重塑与炎症因子的作用. 中国药物经济学. 2022(09): 75-79+85 .
| |
| 4. |
鄢利，朱雅楠. 血浆BNP检测在慢性心力衰竭诊断及治疗中的应用价值分析. 农垦医学. 2022(04): 322-325 .
| |
| 5. |
翁志远，程林，刘崇韬. 卡维地洛联合缬沙坦对慢性心力衰竭患者心功能的影响. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2021(01): 12-14 .
| |
| 6. |
朱晔. 托伐普坦、卡维地洛联合应用对慢性心衰患者疗效的影响. 包头医学. 2021(03): 9-11 .
| |
| 7. |
王大强，韩永建，孙丹. 卡维地洛联合缬沙坦治疗慢性心力衰竭的效果及对患者心功能和脑钠肽水平的影响. 中国实用医刊. 2021(18): 93-96 .
| |
| 8. |
李红云，孙晓宇，唐苗苗，赵园园，沈剑. 踏车运动联合弹力带抗阻运动对Ⅲ级心力衰竭病人心功能的影响. 蚌埠医学院学报. 2021(12): 1688-1691 .
| |
| 9. |
彭宾宾，董宏凯，董少元，屈艳玲. 稳心颗粒联合缬沙坦治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效. 临床合理用药杂志. 2020(27): 78-80 .
| |
| 10. |
李倩. 伊伐布雷定联合卡维地洛对慢性心衰患者心功能及血清NT-pro BNP、AngⅡ水平的影响. 湖北民族大学学报(医学版). 2020(04): 77-79 .
|
© 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部
Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807
Supported by:
Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
DownLoad: