Clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia

HAN Peng; ZHANG Jie; MA Yunpeng; ZHANG Chunli

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20243229

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2025 > 29(6): 80-83. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243229

HAN Peng, ZHANG Jie, MA Yunpeng, ZHANG Chunli. Clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(6): 80-83. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243229

Citation:

PDF (654 KB)

Clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia

Department of Plastic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

More Information

Received Date: July 29, 2024
Revised Date: September 24, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To observe the clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction (WAL) in the treatment of gynecomastia (GYN) patients.
Methods
The clinical data of 80 GYN patients were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical
Methods
, the patients were divided into minimally invasive surgery group (41 cases) and study group (39 cases). The minimally invasive surgery group underwent minimally invasive rotational curettage, while the study group underwent minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with WAL. The surgical indicators, pain intensity 24 hours postoperatively, postoperative complications, and subjective satisfaction were observed and compared between the two groups.
Results
The unilateral surgical duration in the study group was shorter than that in the minimally invasive surgery group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in unilateral incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in pain intensity 24 hours postoperatively between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complicationsin the study group was 5.13%, which was lower than 21.95% in the minimally invasive surgery group (P < 0.05). The study group had higher satisfaction scores for chest flatness without depression and breast symmetry than the minimally invasive surgery group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Compared with minimally invasive rotational curettage alone, the combination of minimally invasive rotational curettage and WAL for GYN patients
Results
in shorter surgical duration, a lower incidence of postoperative complications, and higher patient satisfaction with breast appearance.

FullText(HTML)

References (18)

References

[1]	KARAMCHANDANI M M, DE LA CRUZ KU G, SOKOL B L, et al. Management of gynecomastia and male benign diseases[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2022, 102(6): 989-1005. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36335933/
[2]	刘聪聪, 于子溢, 童滢, 等. 微创旋切术治疗男性乳房发育症的可行性研究[J]. 南京医科大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021, 41(11): 1672-1676. doi: 10.7655/NYDXBNS20211119
[3]	韩伟强, 李丽莎, 陈云, 等. 浅表吸脂术与传统开放式手术切除治疗男性乳房发育症效果比较[J]. 河北医药, 2021, 43(7): 1040-1043. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2021.07.018
[4]	曹晗宸, 刘宏伟. 脂肪抽吸术临床应用现状与展望[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(1): 127-132.
[5]	韩朋, 张洁, 马云鹏, 等. 水动力辅助吸脂联合腺体切除术治疗男性乳房发育[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2022, 33(2): 93-95, 99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2022.02.009
[6]	高春晖, 王晔兴, 林向阳. 乳腺疾病防治指南[M]. 西安: 第四军医大学出版社, 2011: 78-79.
[7]	孔攀, 张莹莹, 邱新光. 男性乳房发育症的诊治进展[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2017, 44(9): 580-582. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4203.2017.09.002
[8]	严广斌. NRS疼痛数字评价量表numerical rating scale[J]. 中华关节外科杂志: 电子版, 2014, 8(3): 410-410.
[9]	中国整形美容协会, 精准与数字医学分会, 精准乳房整形专业委员会, 等. 中国男性乳房发育临床诊治专家共识[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2023, 15(4): 313-323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4136.2023.04.001
[10]	何鹏, 李永飞, 吴意赟, 等. 超声引导下真空辅助旋切术与开放切除术治疗合并钙化灶乳腺肿块的效果比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(22): 13-16. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20213302
[11]	王炫凯, 李贤勇, 郑来检, 等. 真空辅助乳腺微创旋切系统联合抽脂治疗SimonⅡ型男性乳房发育症的临床研究[J]. 中国当代医药, 2024, 31(5): 39-42.
[12]	金铭, 李华强, 张正文. 水动力吸脂与负压吸脂在自体脂肪移植隆胸术中的应用比较[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2020, 10(2): 12-16.
[13]	胡山, 邵文辉. 水动力辅助吸脂对自体脂肪移植隆乳患者手术效果和脂肪移植成活率的影响[J]. 中国美容医学, 2020, 29(1): 120-123.
[14]	梁铮韵, 王友彬, 王智, 等. 吸脂联合乳晕切口腺体切除治疗男性乳房发育[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2022, 33(6): 335-337. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2022.06.005
[15]	吕昊, 楼龙泉, 王海明, 等. 乳腔镜辅助吸脂腺体切除术在治疗男性乳房发育症中的价值研究[J]. 中国现代医生, 2020, 58(1): 52-55.
[16]	韩朋, 张洁, 马云鹏, 等. 麦默通微创旋切术与环乳晕微切口术分别联合水动力吸脂治疗男性乳腺发育症的疗效对比[J]. 中国美容医学, 2024, 33(6): 26-30.
[17]	黄一雄, 周碧玉, 周帆, 等. 脂肪抽吸联合微创切口腺体切除治疗男性乳房发育: 加减平衡及经验[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2022, 26(5): 347-350.
[18]	孙娟, 雷海, 卢怡, 等. 腔镜下溶脂吸脂术与传统开放式切除术治疗男性乳房发育症疗效对比[J]. 中国美容医学, 2023, 32(6): 31-34.

[1]	YAN Chun, SUN Dafeng, ZHANG Weiya. Risk factors of surgical site infection after spinal tuberculosis surgery and establishment of a Nomogram model[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(21): 25-31. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230832
[2]	HU Wen, JIANG Wentao, HU Nan, GU Shensheng. Effect of the duration of microscopic apical surgery on postoperative pain[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(22): 16-19. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222078
[3]	SU Jilan. Influence of different pretreatments on the cleaningquality of overnight surgical instruments[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(24): 124-126, 130. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201924039
[4]	SHI Qiang, PAN Weicheng, LIU Yue, WANG Zhikang, LI Yunjian, CHENG Yun, WEI Jingyu. Effect of surgical repair of refractory subcutaneous effusion after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(24): 89-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201924028
[5]	ZHU Yingqin. Effect of 2% clohexidine glucose combined withearly anal closure in prevention of perineal incision infection in Miles surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(19): 76-78. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201919020
[6]	ZHOU Jun, CAO Guozhen, WANG Hong, ZHENG Yazhen. Nursing measures in operating room in prevention of gastrointestinal surgery incision infection[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (22): 47-49. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201722016
[7]	SHEN Lili. Effect of detailed nursing management in operation room on prevention of incision infection in abdominal operation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (12): 85-87. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201612027
[8]	Lv Ping. Effect of nursing intervention in reducing infection rate of surgical sites in operating room[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (6): 147-149. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201506050
[9]	LU Qin, WANG Li. The analysis of the related factors of the incision infection during operation and its preventive nursing countermeasures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (6): 61-63. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201406020
[10]	XIAO Xifeng, GONG Xiuping, WANG Jiakuan. Correlative factors of hospital infection and nursing countermeasures for elderly surgical patients in the department of orthopedics[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (8): 80-82. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201308030

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	荣晓旭，朱颖，梁晓莉，华婷，殷瑛，陈姝珏. 个案追踪法护理对脊柱术后患者下肢股静脉血流速度及静脉血栓栓塞症的影响. 护理实践与研究. 2025(02): 291-295 .
2.	周钰凤，王安素，赵旭，苏鲜花，陈林，孔维军，廖文波. 脊柱结核病灶清除融合内固定术后住院时间延长的危险因素分析及预测模型构建. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志. 2024(01): 53-61 .
3.	王安素，袁书逸，周钰凤，苏鲜花，孔维军，陈林，廖文波. 脊柱手术部位感染的危险因素分析及列线图的建立与验证. 暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版). 2024(01): 51-59 .
4.	李继凯，王会旺，李通宪，吴华荣. 前路病灶清除植骨融合内固定联合抗骨质疏松治疗老年脊柱结核. 实用骨科杂志. 2024(06): 481-485+495 .

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (6) PDF downloads (4) Cited by(4)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

Other cited types(0)

Catalog

Clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

Other cited types(0)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content