ZENG Yan, ZHANG Wei, XU Gang, ZHANG Xiaowei. Effect of bidirectional traction skin tension reduction technique in treatment of patients with poor healing at position of thoracic drainage tube[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(24): 107-110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232659
Citation: ZENG Yan, ZHANG Wei, XU Gang, ZHANG Xiaowei. Effect of bidirectional traction skin tension reduction technique in treatment of patients with poor healing at position of thoracic drainage tube[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(24): 107-110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232659

Effect of bidirectional traction skin tension reduction technique in treatment of patients with poor healing at position of thoracic drainage tube

More Information
  • Received Date: August 20, 2023
  • Revised Date: October 26, 2023
  • Available Online: January 04, 2024
  • Objective 

    To explore the effect of bidirectional traction skin tension reduction technique in the treatment of patients with poor healing at position of thoracic drainage tube.

    Methods 

    A total of 100 patients with poor healing at thoracic drainage tube after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 50 cases in each group. After preparing the wound bed, the control group was treated with traditional dressing change until wound healing, while the observation group was treated with bidirectional traction skin tension reduction technique to close the wound. The wound healing time, the number of dressing change, wound healing quality and satisfaction degree of wound nursing were compared between the two groups.

    Results 

    Wound healing time and the number of dressing change in the observation group were significantly shorter and less than those in the control group (P < 0.05). At 3 months of wound healing, the score of each item and total score of the Vancouver Scar Scale in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The total satisfaction rate of wound healing in the observation group was 94.00%, which was significantly higher than 72.00% in the control group (P < 0.05).

    Conclusion 

    In the treatment of patients with poor healing at thoracic drainage tube after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer, the application of bidirectional traction skin tension reduction technology can promote wound healing, shorten wound healing time, improve wound healing quality, reduce scar hyperplasia, and increase patients' satisfaction degree to wound nursing.

  • [1]
    SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality world-wide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
    [2]
    罗富超, 黄国刚, 赵齐林, 等. 胸腔镜肺部手术后应用19F胸管引流的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2021, 50(1): 88-91, 96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2021.01.020
    [3]
    管仲, 镇海文, 章斌. 不同口径引流管促进微孔胸腔镜术后快速康复的效果研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(18): 124-125, 130. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20221245
    [4]
    杨帆, 孙战文. 胸腔引流管拔管后切口愈合不良的原因分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2017, 34(12): 2455-2456. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2017.12.067
    [5]
    MUDARRA GARCÍA N, NARANJO PEÑA I, OLIVARES PIZARRO S P, et al. Pre-surgical nutrition support reduces the incidence of surgical wound complications in oncological patients[J]. Nutr Cancer, 2020, 72(5): 801-807. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1653473
    [6]
    SCALISE A, CALAMITA R, TARTAGLIONE C, et al. Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A systematic review of the literature[J]. Int Wound J, 2016, 13(6): 1260-1281. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12492
    [7]
    周海清, 王明雪, 王春叶, 等. 胸腹腔引流管拔除后手术切口愈合不良风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2022, 28(1): 70-75.
    [8]
    何林娜, 高丽, 蒋佼虹. 皮肤减张闭合器缝合与传统缝合对剖宫产术后切口美观度及瘢痕形成情况比较分析[J]. 中国美容医学, 2020, 29(5): 97-100.
    [9]
    甘一帆, 邹奕, 徐凯, 等. 皮肤减张在整形外科中的应用进展[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2023, 34(3): 191-194.
    [10]
    陈孝平, 田伟. 外科学: 改编教学版[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2019: 95.
    [11]
    安俊红, 韩雪, 张春萍. 基于伤口评估三角的干预方案在3期及以上压力性损伤病人延续护理中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(24): 4475-4477. doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.24.026
    [12]
    董炜, 肖玉瑞, 吴敏洁, 等. 中国慢性难愈性创面诊疗思路及原则[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2018, 34(12): 868-873. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.12.010
    [13]
    DISSEMOND J, MATTHEW M, PETER E, et al. The M. O. I. S. T. philosophy of topical treatment of chronic wounds implemented in clinical practice[J]. Wounds International, 2022, 13(4): 34-43.
    [14]
    BARANOSKI S, AYELLO E A. Wound Care Essentials: Practice Principles[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 9-10.
    [15]
    邰安婷, 包满珍, 钱金平, 等. 早期应用藻酸盐联合免缝胶带对腹部伤口脂肪液化的护理效果评价[J]. 中国校医, 2021, 35(7): 532-534.
    [16]
    施晓晓, 汤諹. 瘢痕评估量表的文献复习[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志, 2014, 28(5): 527-529.
    [17]
    王婷, 戴小霞, 刘权兴, 等. 早期肺癌胸腔镜术后切口愈合不良的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志: 电子版, 2022, 15(3): 416-418.
    [18]
    GONZALEZ-RIVAS D, DELGADO M, FIEIRA E, et al. Double sleeve uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 3(2): E2.
    [19]
    高振, 武晓莉, 李青峰. 瘢痕治疗现状与进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1106-1109.
    [20]
    KAZMER D O, EAVES F F. Force modulating tissue bridges for reduction of tension and scar: finite element and image analysis of preclinical incisional and nonincisional models[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2018, 38(11): 1250-1263.
    [21]
    陈珺, 章一新. 章氏超减张缝合在闭合高张力创面中的临床应用效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2020, 36(5): 339-345.
    [22]
    陈立彬, 武晓莉, 陈宗安, 等. 瘢痕整形手术中的减张缝合技巧[J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2019, 15(2): 63-64.
    [23]
    柴琳琳, 汤绪文, 李曾显, 等. LBD减张缝合技术在瘢痕切除术中的应用探讨[J]. 中国美容医学, 2019, 28(8): 16-19.

Catalog

    Article views (138) PDF downloads (7) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return