LIU Jia, FAN Chunguang, SUN Likui, ZHAO Zenglin. Expression changes of interleukin-1α and interleukin-8 in vitro skin stimulation test of medical devices for medical devices with reconstructed human epidermis model[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(11): 18-21,33. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214815
Citation: LIU Jia, FAN Chunguang, SUN Likui, ZHAO Zenglin. Expression changes of interleukin-1α and interleukin-8 in vitro skin stimulation test of medical devices for medical devices with reconstructed human epidermis model[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(11): 18-21,33. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214815

Expression changes of interleukin-1α and interleukin-8 in vitro skin stimulation test of medical devices for medical devices with reconstructed human epidermis model

More Information
  • Received Date: December 06, 2021
  • Available Online: May 04, 2022
  • Objective 

    To explore the skin irritation test in vitro as a substitute test for rabbit skin irritation to detect skin irritation, and to analyze the molecular markers related to the test model.

    Methods 

    Two kinds of medical devices were selected, and skin irritation was detected by reconstructing human epidermis (RhE) model in vitro skin stimulation test. Skin tissue substrates were collected, and the contents of interleukin (IL) -1α and IL-8 in the substrate were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    Results 

    The histopathology showed that the epithelial cells with 4% lactate were atrophied and the cuticle was exfoliated; there was no obvious abnormality in epithelial tissue by other methods. Epithelial cells were degenerate and necrotic in 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polar positive control with sodium chloride injection and 1% non-polar nonpolar positive control with sesame oil. ELISA results showed that IL-1α expression in substrate was positively correlated with skin irritation index, but IL-8 was negatively correlated with skin irritation index.

    Conclusion 

    IL-1α can be used as a molecular marker for RhE model skin irritation test in vitro to analyze skin irritation of medical devices.

  • [1]
    ALÉPÉE N, TORNIER C, ROBERT C, et al. A catch-up validation study on reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE) for full replacement of the Draize skin irritation test[J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 2010, 24(1): 257-266. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.08.024
    [2]
    KANDAROVA H, WILLOUGHBY J A, DE JONG W H, et al. Pre-validation of an in vitro skin irritation test for medical devices using the reconstructed human tissue model EpiDerm[J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 2018, 50: 407-417. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.02.007
    [3]
    DE JONG W H, CARRAWAY J W, LIU C H, et al. The suitability of reconstructed human epidermis models for medical device irritation assessment: a comparison of in Vitro and in Vivo testing results[J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 2020, 69: 104995. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104995
    [4]
    PRESCOTT S L, LARCOMBE D L, LOGAN A C, et al. The skin microbiome: impact of modern environments on skin ecology, barrier integrity, and systemic immune programming[J]. World Allergy Organ J, 2017, 10(1): 29.
    [5]
    TANAKA N, FUJIOKA A, TAJIMA S, et al. Elafin is induced in epidermis in skin disorders with dermal neutrophilic infiltration: interleukin-1 beta and tumour necrosis factor-alpha stimulate its secretion in vitro[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2000, 143(4): 728-732. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03766.x
    [6]
    BARKER J N, MITRA R S, GRIFFITHS C E, et al. Keratinocytes as initiators of inflammation[J]. Lancet, 1991, 337(8735): 211-214. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92168-2
    [7]
    GIBBS S. In vitro irritation models and immune reactions[J]. Skin Pharmacol Physiol, 2009, 22(2): 103-113. doi: 10.1159/000178869
    [8]
    KANDÁROVÁH, BENDOVA H, LETASIOVA S, et al. Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol[J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 2018, 50: 433-438. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.02.009
    [9]
    SUGIYAMA M, AKITA M, ALÉPÉE N, et al. Comparative assessment of 24-hr primary skin irritation test and human patch test data with in vitro skin irritation tests according to OECD Test Guideline 439 (for quasi-drugs in Japan)[J]. J Toxicol Sci, 2018, 43(12): 751-768. doi: 10.2131/jts.43.751
    [10]
    SEURAT E, VERDIN A, CAZIER F, et al. Influence of the environmental relative humidity on the inflammatory response of skin model after exposure to various environmental pollutants[J]. Environ Res, 2021, 196: 110350. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110350
    [11]
    FUSCO L, GARRIDO M, MARTI' N C, et al. Skin irritation potential of graphene-based materials using a non-animal test[J]. Nanoscale, 2020, 12(2): 610-622. doi: 10.1039/C9NR06815E
    [12]
    COQUETTE A, BERNA N, VANDENBOSCH A, et al. Analysis of interleukin-1alpha (IL-1alpha) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) expression and release in in vitro reconstructed human epidermis for the prediction of in vivo skin irritation and/or sensitization[J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 2003, 17(3): 311-321. doi: 10.1016/S0887-2333(03)00019-5

Catalog

    Article views (264) PDF downloads (18) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return