ZHANG Bangjian, HAN Qingtao, LIU Yixin, YANG Chang. Application effect of bronchial blocker positioning in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(18): 34-37. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211990
Citation: ZHANG Bangjian, HAN Qingtao, LIU Yixin, YANG Chang. Application effect of bronchial blocker positioning in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(18): 34-37. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211990

Application effect of bronchial blocker positioning in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation

More Information
  • Received Date: May 12, 2021
  • Available Online: September 03, 2021
  • Published Date: September 27, 2021
  •   Objective  To explore the effect of bronchial blocker (BB) positioning in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation (OLV).
      Method  A total of 166 OLV patients were selected and divided into observation group[positioning of the change of peak airway pressure (Ppeak) difference, n=81] and control group (positioning of fiberoptic bronchoscopy, n=85) according to different positioning methods. The positioning effects of the two groups were compared.
      Results  There were no significant differences in the success rate of positioning and intubation time between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). The positioning time was shorter and total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). At the time points of undergoing double lung ventilation after confirming the correct position of the cuff (T1), undergoing OLV after confirming the correct position of the cuff (T2), undergoing OLV when the cuff was inserted into deep position of the bronchus (T3), and undergoing OLV when the cuff returned to the opening of the bronchus in the shallow position of the tube (T4), Ppeak and plateau pressure (Pplat) of the observation group were significantly lower, and dynamic Compliance (Cdyn) was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). At T3, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of the observation group were significantly lower, and the oxygen saturation (SpO2) was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Compared with fibrobronchial positioning, BB positioning can be applied in OLV patients with faster positioning and higher safety, which can effectively reduce stress response.
  • [1]
    黄江焱, 胡云, 徐华阳. 复方利多卡因胶浆在双腔气管插管全身麻醉胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(19): 79-82. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.202019023
    [2]
    赖习华, 吴稚晖, 陈广, 等. 无管化与常规双腔气管插管单孔胸腔镜肺大疱切除术的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2019, 19(11): 993-995, 1003. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2019.11.009
    [3]
    宋铁鹰, 杨艳超, 王虹, 等. 喉罩联合支气管封堵器在重症肌无力患者胸腔镜手术中的应用[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 39(12): 1451-1454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2018.12.021
    [4]
    弓胜凯, 艾英, 应亮, 等. 可视支气管堵塞器插管和可视双腔支气管导管插管的对比研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2019, 25(11): 45-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2019.11.006
    [5]
    LU Y, DAI W, ZONG Z, et al. Bronchial blocker versus left double-lumen endotracheal tube for one-lung ventilation in right video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2018, 32(1): 297-301. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.07.026
    [6]
    ZHENG M, NIU Z, CHEN P, et al. Effects of bronchial blockers on one-lung ventilation in general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trail[J]. Medicine: Baltimore, 2019, 98(41): e17387. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017387
    [7]
    ZHANG C, YUE J, LI M, et al. Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen endobronchial tube in minimally invasive cardiac surgery[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2019, 19(1): 207. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0956-x
    [8]
    杨波, 姜丽华, 王涛, 等. 腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术中手控和压控肺复张的应用效果[J]. 郑州大学学报: 医学版, 2020, 55(3): 410-414. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYK202003027.htm
    [9]
    冷燕. 多索茶碱对双腔气管插管单肺通气患者术中肺保护效应及其作用机制研究[J]. 四川医学, 2020, 41(4): 402-407. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCYX202004018.htm
    [10]
    党小雅. 术前治疗性抚触联合中医护理干预对乳腺癌患者围手术期应激反应的影响[J]. 西部中医药, 2019, 32(9): 123-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSZY201909037.htm
    [11]
    李真, 祁云. 术后低剂量丙泊酚维持麻醉对声带息肉摘除术病人血流动力学及苏醒期躁动影响[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2019, 44(1): 54-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG201901016.htm
    [12]
    王芳. BIS监测下不同剂量地佐辛应用于腹腔镜手术全身麻醉患者的效果观察[J]. 河北医学, 2019, 25(9): 1560-1564. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HCYX201909041.htm
    [13]
    董小飞. 超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞用于肺癌根治术麻醉及术后镇痛的效果观察[J]. 中国基层医药, 2019, 26(21): 2655-2659. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2019.21.021
    [14]
    杜伏杨, 郭文. 支气管封堵器在电视胸腔镜手术中的应用效果[J]. 安徽医学, 2020, 41(2): 167-169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2020.02.014
    [15]
    杨晴, 马传根, 信文启, 等. 帝视内窥镜引导支气管封堵器放置与定位的价值[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(8): 815-817. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ201908027.htm

Catalog

    Article views (374) PDF downloads (14) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return