Predictive value of blood lactic acid level at ICU admission in acute kidney injury patients with sepsis

TAO Lili; YANG Qilin; CHEN Weixiao

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20210726

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2021 > 25(14): 41-44, 53. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210726

TAO Lili, YANG Qilin, CHEN Weixiao. Predictive value of blood lactic acid level at ICU admission in acute kidney injury patients with sepsis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(14): 41-44, 53. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210726

Citation:

PDF (813 KB)

Predictive value of blood lactic acid level at ICU admission in acute kidney injury patients with sepsis

Intensive Care Unit, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510260

More Information

Received Date: February 21, 2021
Available Online: July 25, 2021
Published Date: July 27, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To investigate the predictive value of serum lactic acid level at admission of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) 12 hours after admission by a secondary analysis of the prospective FINNAKI study.
Methods A total of 409 sepsis patients without AKI at admission of ICU were selected as study objects from FINNAKI cohort data, and were divided into low level lactic acid group, medium level lactic acid group and high level lactic acid group by blood lactic acid quantile method. The incidence of AKI and the application of renal replacement therapy (RRT) were compared 12 h later in the three groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the predictive values of serum lactic acid level on the occurrence of AKI and the application of RRT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.
Results The incidence rates of AKI were 21.21% in the low level lactic acid group, 33.58%in the medium level lactic acid group and 49.65% in the high level lactic acid group respectively (P < 0.001). After adjusting independent variables, multivariate regression analysis showed that risk of AKI increased by 23%for every 1 mmol/L increase of blood lactate in septic patients(P=0.001). The risk of AKI in the high level lactate group was 2.31 times higher than that in the low lactate group(P=0.010). ROC curve showed that the AUC serum lactic acid level at admission in predicting AKI in septic patients was 0.66 (95%CI, 0.60 to 0.72). The AUC for lactate predicting the use of RRT in septic AKI patients was 0.70 (95%CI, 0.60 to 0.80).
Conclusion Lactate at ICU admission can predict AKI and the use of RRT in septic patients.
- Intensive Care Unit,
- blood lactic acid,
- acute kidney injury,
- sepsis,
- prediction

FullText(HTML)

References (22)

References

[1]	STANSKI N L, WONG H R. Prognostic and predictive enrichment in Sepsis[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2020, 16(1): 20-31. http://www.nature.com/articles/s41581-019-0199-3
[2]	DE BACKER D, CECCONI M, LIPMAN J, et al. Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2019, 45(4): 420-433. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05544-x
[3]	BELLOMO R, KELLUM J A, RONCO C. Acute kidney injury[J]. Lancet, 2012, 380(9843): 756-766. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22617274?dopt=Abstract
[4]	POSTON J T, KOYNER J L. Sepsis associated acute kidney injury[J]. BMJ Clin Res Ed, 2019, 364: k4891.
[5]	UMBRO I, GENTILE G, TINTI F, et al. Recent advances in pathophysiology and biomarkers of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury[J]. J Infect, 2016, 72(2): 131-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.11.008
[6]	毛自若, 周保纯, 徐信发, 等. 早期血乳酸水平预测特重度烧伤患者急性肾损伤加重的价值[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2019, 22(6): 556-561. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2019.06.012
[7]	VAARA S T, HOLLMÉN M, KORHONEN A M, et al. Soluble CD73 in critically ill septic patients-data from the prospective FINNAKI study[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(10): e0164420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164420
[8]	VINCENT J L, BAKKER J. Blood lactate levels in Sepsis: in 8 questions[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2021, 27(3): 298-302. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000824
[9]	OLIVEIRA R A G, MENDES P V, PARK M, et al. Factors associated with renal Doppler resistive index in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2019, 9(1): 23. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0500-4
[10]	SUN D Q, ZHENG C F, LU F B, et al. Serum lactate level accurately predicts mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 30(11): 1361-1367. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001189
[11]	BARRETO A G, DAHER E F, SILVA J G, et al. Risk factors for acute kidney injury and 30-day mortality after liver transplantation[J]. Ann Hepatol, 2015, 14(5): 688-694. doi: 10.1016/S1665-2681(19)30763-X
[12]	ZHANG Z, NI H. Normalized lactate load is associated with development of acute kidney injury in patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass surgery[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(3): e0120466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120466
[13]	FREIRE J P, WIERINGA N, DE FELICE E, et al. The association of early combined lactate and glucose levels with subsequent renal and liver dysfunction and hospital mortality in critically ill patients[J]. Crit Care, 2017, 21(1): 218. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563890/
[14]	王汝菲, 马英, 李博. 血清乳酸水平对急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者急性肾损伤病情的预测价值分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2021, 45(4): 632-634. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2021.04.062
[15]	段袁园, 金丹群, 许愿愿, 等. PICU脓毒症患儿并发急性肾损伤的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2019, 31(8): 1004-1007. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.08.018
[16]	杨超, 冯霞, 黄婧源. PCT、Lac、cTnI、cTnT及其联合检测对ICU脓毒症合并AKI患者的诊断价值[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2021, 28(3): 447-451.
[17]	任广胜, 胡善友, 张和凤, 等. 血清胱抑素C联合血乳酸对脓毒症急性肾损伤早期诊断的价值[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2019, 14(6): 540-543. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2019.06.013
[18]	刘晓原, 裴源源, 朱继红. 脓毒性休克致急性肾损伤患者的危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志: 电子版, 2018, 11(6): 366-371. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2018.06.002
[19]	HSU Y C, HSU C W. Septic acute kidney injury patients in emergency department: The risk factors and its correlation to serum lactate[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2019, 37(2): 204-208. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675718303759
[20]	殷静静, 郑瑞强, 林华, 等. 持续肾脏替代治疗时机对感染性休克合并急性肾损伤患者预后的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(7): 63-66. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201807017
[21]	CHEN W Y, CAI L H, ZHANG Z H, et al. The timing of continuous renal replacement therapy initiation in Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: the CRTSAKI Study (Continuous RRT Timing in Sepsis-associated AKI in ICU): study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(2): e040718.
[22]	GISEWHITE S, STEWART I J, BEILMAN G, et al. Urinary metabolites predict mortality or need for renal replacement therapy after combat injury[J]. Crit Care, 2021, 25(1): 119. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/350329357_Urinary_metabolites_predict_mortality_or_need_for_renal_replacement_therapy_after_combat_injury

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(34)

1.	魏旭霞，宋丹丹，赵旭. 基于思维导图构建通气治疗重症肺炎新生儿的协作式“零缺陷”护理模式. 河南医学研究. 2025(03): 563-565 .
2.	张煜晶，王娟，李丽颖，卓瑞燕. 抚触联合三阶梯俯卧位干预在早产儿持续气道内正压通气治疗中的应用. 福建医药杂志. 2024(01): 176-178 .
3.	齐娟. 袋鼠式护理配合婴儿抚触对新生儿睡眠的影响. 中国城乡企业卫生. 2024(04): 72-74 .
4.	曾慧芳. 趣味视频示范联合抚触护理干预对肺炎患儿呼吸循环状况及康复进程的影响. 医学信息. 2024(18): 189-192 .
5.	陈小玲，姚小琴，颜惠萍，吴明锦，施月菊. 改良俯卧位通气联合按摩抚触在低出生体重儿机械通气中的应用. 中外医学研究. 2024(30): 65-68 .
6.	林梅莲，商孟芳. 非语言性沟通联合预警护理模式对肺炎支原体肺炎婴幼儿哭闹频率及睡眠质量的影响. 世界睡眠医学杂志. 2024(11): 2504-2506+2510 .
7.	许丹萍，叶严丽. 基于发展性照护的多维护理对新生儿肺炎患儿应激反应、生长发育的影响. 中国医药科学. 2023(10): 129-132 .
8.	张婷. 抚触护理在新生儿肺炎中的应用. 妇儿健康导刊. 2023(24): 148-150 .
9.	郑红娟. 音乐疗法结合安抚、抚触护理对眼科疾病患儿抗拒情绪及配合度的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2022(02): 154-156 .
10.	兰海利，姜艳丽，连金利. 体位护理对肺炎新生儿痰液排出及住院时间的影响. 黑龙江医药科学. 2022(01): 136-138+141 .
11.	左广霞，高香花，李晓燕. 以治疗性抚触为主的康复干预应用于重症肺炎BAL治疗中的效果观察. 中国疗养医学. 2022(06): 617-619 .
12.	阎洁，程功梅. 早期口腔运动训练联合新生儿抚触在晚期早产儿护理中的应用效果. 中国医药导报. 2022(13): 181-184 .
13.	陈燕琼. 早期抚触支持护理对新生儿母乳喂养及生理性黄疸的影响研究. 中外医疗. 2022(07): 127-131 .
14.	刘佩. 体位变换联合抚触护理对肺炎新生儿奶摄取量及呼吸循环功能的影响. 基层医学论坛. 2022(26): 88-90 .
15.	张红利，张慧，王金永. 协同干预模式对产科新生儿听力筛查初筛结果的影响. 中国实用医刊. 2022(16): 60-63 .
16.	付延霞，王丽，孟芳铭，胡莹莹，王晓辉. 康复护理在新生儿肺炎纤维支气管镜肺泡灌洗治疗中的应用效果. 护理实践与研究. 2021(01): 111-113 .
17.	吴颖，鲁金金. 抚触联合童趣化健康教育对癫痫患儿治疗依从性及生活质量影响. 社区医学杂志. 2021(05): 305-309 .
18.	朱红丹. 抚触护理干预对新生儿肺炎心理运动功能、智能发育的影响. 航空航天医学杂志. 2021(06): 759-760 .
19.	李敏. 早产儿发展性照顾护理的进展及前景. 基层医学论坛. 2021(24): 3534-3536 .
20.	赵小佳，唐金草，刘玲玲. 循证药学联合抚触护理在小儿反复呼吸道感染中的应用效果. 河南医学研究. 2021(24): 4583-4585 .
21.	徐传艳. 细节及舒适护理联合支气管肺炎排痰仪在小儿肺炎中的应用效果. 当代护士(下旬刊). 2021(10): 86-88 .
22.	林少芳. 抚触护理配合耳道护理对新生儿听力筛查测试结果的影响. 中国卫生标准管理. 2021(20): 126-129 .
23.	刘瑞荣. 俯卧位通气干预联合按摩抚触在新生儿肺炎护理中的应用价值分析. 现代诊断与治疗. 2021(22): 3663-3664 .
24.	李茸茸，张璐. 抚触联合游泳在新生儿胆红素脑病护理中的应用. 护理研究. 2020(08): 1351-1355 .
25.	刘萍，房艳荣. 家庭参与式护理在新生儿护理管理中的应用效果及对新生儿生长发育的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2020(13): 176-178 .
26.	齐丽. 抚触护理对新生儿肺炎患儿心理运动功能及智能发育的影响. 中国民康医学. 2020(07): 146-147 .
27.	杨静. 抚触护理措施应用于新生儿肺炎的护理价值研究. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2020(16): 130+132 .
28.	房艳荣，刘萍. 抚触护理对新生儿黄疸及其预后的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2020(16): 177-179 .
29.	周田，董芳香. 新生儿抚触护理对早期新生儿生长发育的应用价值体会. 人人健康. 2020(12): 226 .
30.	杨月萍. 婴儿生长发育在抚触护理下的效果观察. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2020(25): 161-162 .
31.	叶欢. 人性化护理模式在新生儿肺炎护理中的综合效果观察. 中国继续医学教育. 2020(19): 192-193 .
32.	于丹丹. 抚触不同开始时间对新生儿体格发育、智能发育及神经发育的影响. 中国医药指南. 2020(20): 168-169 .
33.	陈新. 研究抚触联合康复护理对新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病患儿生长发育的影响. 中国实用医药. 2020(21): 176-178 .
34.	李莲. 心理护理方法在新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中的应用价值. 青海医药杂志. 2020(06): 62-63 .

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (489) PDF downloads (41) Cited by(34)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Predictive value of blood lactic acid level at ICU admission in acute kidney injury patients with sepsis

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(34)

Other cited types(0)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content