ZHANG Haiqing, CHEN Xiaoyou, ZHOU Dongqing, ZHANG Xuedi, ZHANG Limao, WEI Sumei, LIU Chengyong, HUANG Haibin, JIA Tong. Relationship between gyrA gene mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the minimum inhibitory concentration of fluoroquinolones in vitro[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(14): 4-8, 14. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210716
Citation: ZHANG Haiqing, CHEN Xiaoyou, ZHOU Dongqing, ZHANG Xuedi, ZHANG Limao, WEI Sumei, LIU Chengyong, HUANG Haibin, JIA Tong. Relationship between gyrA gene mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the minimum inhibitory concentration of fluoroquinolones in vitro[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(14): 4-8, 14. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210716

Relationship between gyrA gene mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the minimum inhibitory concentration of fluoroquinolones in vitro

More Information
  • Received Date: February 20, 2021
  • Available Online: July 25, 2021
  • Published Date: July 27, 2021
  •   Objective  To explore the relationship between gyrA gene mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fluoroquinolones in vitro.
      Methods  Clinical isolated positive strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 640 patients were collected. The probe solubility curve was used to screen strains with mutation of gyrA gene in the drug resistance determining region, and sequencing of the drug resistance determining region was performed. The MICs of ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin for strains with mutations at different loci were detected, and the differences were analyzed.
      Results  A total of 45 strains (7.03%) with gyrA gene mutation were screened out by the probe solubility curve, including 15(33.33%) with the codon 90 mutation, 26(57.78%) with the codon 94 mutation, and 4(8.89%) with the codon 91 mutation. Among strains with the codon 90 mutation, 2 strains showed high resistance to ofloxacin, no levofloxacin-resistant strains were found, 3 showed low resistance to moxifloxacin, 2 showed high resistance to moxifloxacin, and 3 showed high resistance to gatifloxacin. Among strains with the codon 91 mutation, no ofloxacin or levofloxacin-resistant strains were found.Two strains showed high resistance to moxifloxacin, and 1 showed high resistance to gatifloxacin. Among strains with the codon 94 mutation, 4 strains showed low resistance and 7 showed highly resistant to ofloxacin, 7 showed low resistance to levofloxacin, 2 showed low resistance and 13 showed high resistance to moxifloxacin, 3 showed low resistance and 14 showed high resistance to gatifloxacin.For strains with the codon 90 mutation, except for levofloxacin, they were all highly resistant to the other drugs.Strains with the codon 91 mutation were prone to have high resistance to moxifloxacin, and strains with the codon 94 mutation were mostly highly resistant to moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, especially those with Aspartic acid (Asp)→Asparagine (Asn) and Asp→Glycine (Gly).
      Conclusion  The type of gyrA gene mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is related to the MICs of fluoroquinolones, which provides important reference for clinical medication.
  • [1]
    王淑霞, 高微微. 耐药肺结核的诊断与治疗[J]. 临床内科杂志, 2020, 37(10): 681-683. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2020.10.002
    [2]
    中国防痨协会. 耐药结核病化学治疗指南(2019年简版)[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2019, 41(10): 1025-1073. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2019.10.001
    [3]
    CHANG C M, SHIH H I, WU C J, et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Haemophilus influenzae from nursing home residents in Taiwan: correlation of MICs and mutations in QRDRs[J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2020, 128(6): 1624-1633. doi: 10.1111/jam.14580
    [4]
    ROY B, TOUSIF AHAMED S K, BANDYOPADHYAY B, et al. Development of quinolone resistance and prevalence of different virulence genes among Shigella flexneri and Shigella dysenteriae in environmental water samples[J]. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2020, 71(1): 86-93. doi: 10.1111/lam.13262
    [5]
    SIRGEL F A, WARREN R M, STREICHER E M, et al. gyrA mutations and phenotypic susceptibility levels to ofloxacin and moxifloxacin in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2012, 67(5): 1088-1093. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks033
    [6]
    ORGANIZATION W H. Policy Guidance on Drug-Susceptibility Testing (DST) of second-line antituberculosis drugs[J]. World Health Organization, 2008, 8(11): 524. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290924
    [7]
    CHIEN J Y, CHIEN S T, CHIU W Y, et al. Moxifloxacin improves treatment outcomes in patients with ofloxacin-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2016, 60(8): 4708-4716. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00425-16
    [8]
    IMPERIALE B R, DI GIULIO Á B, ADRIÁN CATALDI A, et al. Evaluation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cross-resistance to isoniazid, rifampicin and levofloxacin with their respective structural analogs[J]. J Antibiot: Tokyo, 2014, 67(11): 749-754. doi: 10.1038/ja.2014.61
    [9]
    WANG Z, XIE T, MU C, et al. Performance of sequencing in predicting ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis from positive bactec MGIT 960 cultures[J]. Ann Clin Lab Sci, 2018, 48(1): 69-74. http://smartsearch.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=cf802a0f67302335f2faf2e09f8af29a
    [10]
    孟繁荣, 杨瑜, 雷杰, 等. 中国氟喹诺酮耐药结核分枝杆菌gyr基因序列特征分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2020, 36(11): 1503-1508. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.11.019
    [11]
    HAMEED H M A, TAN Y, ISLAM M M, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of levofloxacin-and moxifloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in Southern China[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(11): 4613-4625. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.03
    [12]
    CHERNYAEVA E, FEDOROVA E, ZHEMKOVA G, et al. Characterization of multiple and extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with different ofloxacin-resistance levels[J]. Tuberculosis, 2013, 93(3): 291-295. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.02.005
    [13]
    KAMBLI P, AJBANI K, NIKAM C, et al. Determination of MICs of levofloxacin for Mycobacterium tuberculosis with gyrA mutations[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2015, 19(10): 1227-1229. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0277
    [14]
    ABDELAZEEM W M, ZOLNIKOV T R, MOHAMMED Z R, et al. Virulence, antimicrobial resistance and phylogenetic analysis of zoonotic walking pneumonia Mycoplasma arginini in the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius)[J]. Acta Trop, 2020, 207: 105500. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105500
    [15]
    HUO F, MA Y, LI S, et al. Specific gyrA gene mutations correlate with high prevalence of discordant levofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Beijing, China[J]. J Mol Diagn, 2020, 22(9): 1199-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.06.010
    [16]
    KORNE-ELENBAAS J D, POL A, VET J, et al. Simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and fluoroquinolone resistance mutations to enable rapid prescription of oral antibiotics[J]. Sex Transm Dis, 2020, 47(4): 238-242. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001141
    [17]
    JIAN M J, CHENG Y H, CHUNG H Y, et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in carbapenem-resistant Elizabethkingia anophelis: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of clinical isolates with topoisomerase mutations and comparative genomic analysis[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2019, 74(6): 1503-1510. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz045
    [18]
    张志国, 杜春英, 张倩. 我国结核分枝杆菌gyrA不同突变类型对氟喹诺酮类药物耐药水平的相关性研究[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2016, 38(9): 706-711. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2016.09.003
    [19]
    高敏, 杨婷婷, 李桂莲, 等. 基于全基因组测序的我国耐多药结核分枝杆菌耐药突变特征分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2020, 41(5): 770-775. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20191111-00800
    [20]
    EDWARDS B D, EDWARDS J, COOPER R, et al. Incidence, treatment, and outcomes of isoniazid mono-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections in Alberta, Canada from 2007-2017[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(3): e0229691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229691
    [21]
    XU Z, CAVE R, CHEN L, et al. Antibiotic resistance and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis recovered from hospital personnel in China[J]. J Glob Antimicrob Resist, 2020, 22: 195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.013
  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Tianyi, REN Yue, SONG Zhenya, JIANG Meinan, LI Mengyang, CHEN Yong, YIN Xudong. Research progress of pan-immune inflammation value in prognosis and effect of tumors[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(5): 139-143. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233348
    [2]HU Ru, GUO Huaijuan, WANG Ying, YAN Xuebing, JIANG Qian. Value of C-PLAN index as a prognostic indicator of advanced esophageal cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(1): 1-6, 12. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232676
    [3]JI Chao, CHEN Yixiao, LIU Kai, SU Xiaochen, TENG Menghao, GUO Yan, JI Wenchen, LI Meng. Screening of diagnostic biomarkers and their relations with immune cell infiltration in osteoporosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(15): 1-6. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231718
    [4]LI Donglin, GUO Huaijuan, WANG Ying, YAN Xuebing, LU Meiling. Clinical investigation in abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum in tumor tissues as a prognostic biomarker for stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(9): 25-31. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230271
    [5]WANG Qiqi, YE Bicheng, WANG Changcheng. Correlation between AHSA1 expression and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on TCGA database analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(1): 8-17. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213231
    [6]JU Yuejun, SHEN Ting, CHEN Gang, KONG Yinghong. Correlations between LncRNA CRNDE and prognosis, immune infiltration of papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(24): 20-24. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212903
    [7]WEI Xin, LIU Xia, SHI Lin, YUN Fen, JIA Yongfeng. Effect of fucosyltransferase 8 expression on immunecell infiltration and survival prognosis in breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(17): 76-81, 87. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211784
    [8]LIU Dehui, YAN Yulan. Research progress of circRNAs in diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(13): 124-128. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211851
    [9]ZHANG Zhou, YANG Tingsong, CHEN Xi, WANG Qun, ZHANG Ti, FANG Lin. Correlation between SIRT2 expression in gastric carcinoma tissues and clinical prognosis in gastric cancer patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (9): 69-72. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201509020
    [10]LI Hua, ZHANG Jinsong, ZHANG Qin, LIU Xia, CHEN Yan. Analysis on prognosis factors of acute paraquat intoxication and its emergency treatment[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (23): 56-58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201323016
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 吴怀琼,孙文静,林坤,傅杰,马云云. ADOPT干预模式对肝癌腹水患者FACT-G评分及症状困扰程度的影响. 国际护理学杂志. 2024(03): 479-483 .
    2. 夏漫. ADOPT模式的健康教育与情绪引导在消化内镜诊疗中的联合应用价值. 广州医药. 2024(02): 192-197 .
    3. 闫亚文,赵勤芳,汪改改,张凤莲. ADOPT护理模式对高龄足月初产妇母乳喂养率、心理韧性及家庭幸福感的影响. 海南医学. 2024(07): 1031-1036 .
    4. 肖红,张咏梅,徐小艳,秦意,李燕. 问题解决模式在临床护理应用的研究进展. 当代护士(中旬刊). 2024(07): 11-15 .
    5. 吴少梅,刘会茹,陈俊兰. 基于HEART沟通模式的“态度-定义-开放思维-计划-实施”护理方案在数字化导板种植中的应用. 中国当代医药. 2024(21): 176-180 .
    6. 陈红,唐金,韩冬梅. ADOPT模式护理在行放射治疗老年肺癌患者中的应用效果. 中西医结合护理(中英文). 2023(02): 112-114 .
    7. 初淑媛,刘兴华,袁慧婷. ADOPT护理模式对全喉切除术患者自我护理质量及生活质量的改善作用. 中国实用乡村医生杂志. 2023(02): 39-41+45 .
    8. 孙露颖,戴欣,闫澍,王艳. ADOPT模式护理干预对前牙外伤患者即刻种植修复效果的影响. 中国医刊. 2023(10): 1126-1129 .
    9. 叶梅珍,江烟青,王琼. ADOPT护理模式联合团体干预对鼻咽癌患者的影响. 齐鲁护理杂志. 2023(24): 9-12 .
    10. 彭江英,苏俊玲,郭春蕊. ADOPT模式在乳腺癌PICC置管患者中的应用. 中华现代护理杂志. 2022(09): 1233-1237 .
    11. 李佩佩,张玲玲. 基于ADOPT护理策略对脑梗死偏瘫患者神经功能及步态的影响. 现代医药卫生. 2022(17): 3006-3009 .
    12. 张红梅. 循证护理在鼻咽癌患者放疗护理中的效果观察及对并发症发生率的影响. 中国医药指南. 2021(15): 11-13 .
    13. 刘晓新,刘进炼,顾士杨,董桂秋,吴秋月,徐媛. ADOPT问题解决模式在糖尿病肾病早期微量白蛋白尿病人中的应用效果观察. 循证护理. 2021(17): 2342-2345 .
    14. 陈季云,刘琪,汤珍珍. 鼻咽癌患者在放射治疗期间行ADOPT护理模式联合团体干预对其生活质量和张口困难程度的影响. 中西医结合护理(中英文). 2021(03): 110-112 .
    15. 赵姗姗. 晚期胃癌患者接受化学药物治疗期间应用不同护理模式的效果比较. 中西医结合护理(中英文). 2021(12): 157-159 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (505) PDF downloads (59) Cited by(15)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return