MENG Fei, HUA Fu. Hysterolaparoscopic surgery versus vaginal surgery in the treatment of patients withcicatricial diverticulum of uterus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(11): 70-72. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911020
Citation: MENG Fei, HUA Fu. Hysterolaparoscopic surgery versus vaginal surgery in the treatment of patients withcicatricial diverticulum of uterus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(11): 70-72. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911020

Hysterolaparoscopic surgery versus vaginal surgery in the treatment of patients withcicatricial diverticulum of uterus

More Information
  • Received Date: April 14, 2019
  • Accepted Date: May 12, 2019
  • Available Online: February 22, 2021
  • Published Date: June 14, 2019
  •   Objective  To compare the effect of hysterolaparoscopic surgery and vaginal surgery on the treatment of patients with cicatricial diverticulum of uterus.
      Methods  Totally 26 patients with cicatricial diverticulum of uterus were divided into hysterolaparoscopy group and vaginal surgery group. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss and hospitalization cost were compared between the two groups. The efficacy was compared between the two groups.
      Results  The operation time and average hospitalization expenses of the vaginal surgery group were significantly less than those of the hysterolaparoscopy group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the amount of bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05). The total effective rates of hysterolaparoscopy group and vaginal surgery group were 100.00%, and there was no significant difference (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  Both hysterolaparoscopic surgery and vaginal repair surgery can achieve good therapeutic effect on treating cicatricial diverticulum of uterus, and both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Clinicians should choose the treatment plan according to the actual situation.
  • [1]
    陈思蕾, 王丹丹, 杨清. 剖宫产子宫瘢痕憩室的修复与妊娠安全[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(1): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFCZ201801006.htm
    [2]
    孙启建, 尹笋. 宫腹腔镜联合修复剖宫产后子宫瘢痕憩室11例临床分析[J]. 中国保健营养: 中旬刊, 2014(7): 4726-4727.
    [3]
    伍艳苗, 杨云. 宫腔镜电切与阴式手术应用于子宫瘢痕憩室治疗中的对比研究[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2018, 29(7): 1076-1078. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8174.2018.07.036
    [4]
    谭慧珍. 宫腔镜治疗剖宫产子宫切口瘢痕缺陷的临床分析[J]. 现代妇产科展, 2013, 22(10): 862-864. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDFC201310029.htm
    [5]
    Turmond A S, Harvey W J, Smith S A. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnose by sonohysterectomy[J]. Ultrasound Med, 1999, 18(1): 13-16. doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13
    [6]
    Wang C B, Chiu W W, Lee C Y, et al. Cesarean scar defect correlation between cesarean section number, defect size. Clinical symptoms and uterine position[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34(1): 85-89. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405
    [7]
    冠男, 王武亮, 袁博, 等. 子宫切口瘢痕憩室形成的相关因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2015, 18(4): 421-424. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2015.04.016
    [8]
    马莹莹, 何莲芝. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室的诊治进展[J]. 安徽医药, 2018, 22(1): 21-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2018.01.005
    [9]
    李丽萍, 刘杰, 陆相辉. 宫腹腔镜下瘢痕切除修补术与雌孕激素治疗78例剖宫产切口憩室的效果比较研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(25): 4407-4409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201525068.htm
    [10]
    顾小燕, 杨大震, 曹剑, 等. 宫腹腔镜联合手术与阴式手术治疗剖宫产子宫切口憩室的研究分析[J]. 哈尔滨医药, 2017, 37(6): 556-557. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYY201706026.htm
  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Panying, ZHANG Xiaofeng, YIN Jianyun, REN Xiaowei, YANG Jing, NI Qian. Research progress on genetic factors related to lung function[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(3): 133-137, 143. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20244444
    [2]DONG Kui, WU Jie, YAN Jing, LIU Haitao, QIAO Guan'en. Mendelian randomization study on the causality between dietary factors and gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(23): 75-80, 86. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242711
    [3]ZHANG Kaiyue, WEI Lai, HUANG Yuanpeng. Visual analysis of the knowledge map of Mendelian randomization studies in the field of cancer based on CiteSpace software[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(23): 1-7. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243021
    [4]ZHU Jingxin, MA Rui, CHAI Zekun, DONG Yuran, WANG Le. A Mendelian randomization study on the causal association between social stress and tinnitus onset[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(19): 55-59, 67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242091
    [5]LIU Lianlian, YU Huiyong, LI Lei, GUO Yufei, NIE Tianyang, MAN Tian, WEI Shixiang, XIE Chuxi, CHEN Tianyun, WANG Chengxiang. Mendelian randomization analysis of the causal association between bronchial asthma and bone mineral density[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(14): 24-29. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241383
    [6]XU Minglu, YANG Xiaohan, LIU Qiannan, YI Chang. Analysis in association rules of chronic diseases in the elderly people[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(13): 103-108. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240556
    [7]LIU Bo, YOU Junjie, ZHENG Silin, HUANG Min. Causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on Mendelian randomization analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(1): 113-117. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232575
    [8]YAO Junjie, QI Wei, ZHANG Xinxin, LIU Chang, PANG Tingting, LI Jiahui, SHANG Qiangqiang. Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 136-140, 145. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214841
    [9]ZHANG Zeyuan, YANG Hongren. Effect of modified yinqiao powdeRon whole genome spectral expression in monkey with hand-foot-mouth disease induced by CA16 virus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (9): 126-128. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201709033
    [10]CHEN Li-juan, LI Jian-yong, Qian Si-xuan, Qian Yu-jie, Xu Jia-ren, QIU Hai-rong. APPLICATION OF COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION IN LYMPHOMA[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2006, (9): 1-3. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2006.09.001
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 易美连,潘燕,喻水平,姚小燕,龙小容. 无缝隙护理配合手术室护理对后路腰椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病患者的影响. 中国当代医药. 2023(13): 177-180 .
    2. 万红梅,吴嘉怡,王洋. 以护士为主导的健康促进干预计划在宫颈癌ARHI紫杉醇耐药性护理中的应用. 国际护理学杂志. 2023(18): 3350-3354 .
    3. 马果. 深层肌康复训练在腰椎管狭窄症患者腰椎微创手术后的应用效果. 中国民康医学. 2022(04): 74-76 .
    4. 徐桂香,王永宏,李士敏,陈双凤,刘玮. 高龄腰椎骨折手术患者采用无缝隙护理配合工作模式的效果评价. 皖南医学院学报. 2022(02): 199-201 .
    5. 李玲玉,刘煊文. 腰椎管狭窄症患者X线、MRI腰椎参数与预后的关系. 影像科学与光化学. 2022(05): 1108-1112 .
    6. 付解辉,张泽升,向明,黄琳森,江苏珍. 骨科康复一体化在PFN-A内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折中的应用效果. 中国医药科学. 2022(18): 161-164+193 .
    7. 丁毅,陈勤,刘宁,朱丽梅. 德克萨斯脊柱康复计划对腰椎术后患者的影响. 深圳中西医结合杂志. 2021(17): 129-131 .
    8. 关露娟,吕燕碧,严素敏. 中药热庵包康复护理对腰椎退行性变患者腰部功能的影响. 中西医结合护理(中英文). 2021(02): 61-64 .
    9. 宋远丽,谢莲. 金黄膏外敷联合挑四缝中医辨证施护治疗下肢丹毒患者红赤肿胀的效果和安全性. 中西医结合护理(中英文). 2021(02): 69-72 .
    10. 刘冬梅,陈品,谢凯悦,张华春. 综合护理干预在颈椎病行前路减压植骨内固定术中的应用效果. 结直肠肛门外科. 2021(S2): 123 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (309) PDF downloads (6) Cited by(10)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return