俯卧位超声评估拟行经皮肾镜取石术患者肾后结肠的价值

Value of prone position ultrasound in evaluating retrorenal colon in patients scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨俯卧位超声评估拟行经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)患者肾后结肠的应用价值。
    方法 选取651例拟行PCNL的患者为研究对象。所有患者术前均接受仰卧位计算机断层扫描(CT)及俯卧位超声检查以评估肾后结肠。肾后结肠定义为结肠位于肾脏后方且下缘超过肾脏下极, 并根据覆盖程度分为轻度(≤3.0 cm)、中度(>3.0 cm且不超过肾门)、重度(超过肾门)。对超声诊断为肾后结肠的患者,进一步行俯卧位CT检查。对比超声与仰卧位、俯卧位CT在肾后结肠诊断及分级中的一致性,并分析其对穿刺通道选择及手术方式的影响。
    结果 651例患者中,俯卧位超声诊断肾后结肠57例。其中,轻度43例,中度11例,重度3例。俯卧位CT诊断肾后结肠55例,其中轻度42例,中度10例,重度3例。仰卧位CT诊断肾后结肠26例,其中轻度23例,中度2例,重度1例。仰卧位CT对肾后结肠的检出率低于俯卧位超声,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。12例(轻度4例,中度7例,重度1例)超声诊断为肾后结肠的患者调整了穿刺通道, 2例重度患者改变了手术方式。
    结论 俯卧位超声与俯卧位CT在肾后结肠评估中具有良好一致性。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the application value of prone-position ultrasound in assessing retrorenal colon among patients scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
    Methods A total of 651 patients scheduled for PCNL were enrolled. All patients underwent preoperative supine-position computed tomography (CT) and prone-position ultrasound to assess retrorenal colon. Retrorenal colon was defined as segment of the colon located posterior to the kidney, with its inferior margin extending beyond the lower pole of the kidney. The degree of coverage was classified as mild (≤3.0 cm), moderate (>3.0 cm without extending beyond the renal hilum) and severe (extending beyond the renal hilum). Patients diagnosed with retrorenal colon by ultrasound underwent further evaluation using prone-position CT. Concordance between ultrasound and supine-position or prone-position CT in diagnosing and classifying retrorenal colon was compared, and the impact on puncture pathway selection and surgical approach was analyzed.
    Results Among 651 patients, prone-position ultrasound identified retrorenal colon in 57 patients, including 43 mild cases, 11 moderate cases, and 3 severe cases. Prone-position CT identified retrorenal colon in 55 patients, including 42 mild cases, 10 moderate cases, and 3 severe cases. Supine CT identified retrorenal colon in 26 patients, including 23 mild cases, 2 moderate cases, and 1 severe case. The detection rate of retrorenal colon by supine CT was significantly lower than that by prone-position ultrasound (P < 0.05). In 12 patients (4 mild cases, 7 moderate cases, 1 severe case), the puncture pathway was modified based on ultrasound diagnosis, and 2 patients with severe involvement underwent a change in surgical approach.
    Conclusion Prone-position ultrasound demonstrates good agreement with prone-position CT in the assessment of retrorenal colon.

     

/

返回文章
返回