富血小板血浆治疗糖尿病足溃疡的荟萃分析

A meta-analysis of platelet-rich plasma for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

  • 摘要:
    目的  采用荟萃分析的方法评价富血小板血浆(PRP)对糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的临床疗效。
    方法  通过检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science、NEJM、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库及中国生物医学文献服务系统等数据库,收集PRP治疗DFU相关文献,阅读文献并提取效应量。使用RevMan5.3软件对提取的数据进行荟萃分析。
    结果  本研究共纳入文献6篇,包括440例患者,其中实验组(PRP联合常规治疗)208例,对照组(常规治疗、空白对照或安慰剂治疗)232例。实验组溃疡愈合有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(OR=1.29, 95%CI: 1.19~1.40, P<0.05); 实验组不良反应率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(OR=0.33, 95%CI: 0.12~0.93, P=0.94)。实验组愈合时间(MD=-14.37, 95%CI: -23.12~-5.62, P=0.001)、溃疡表面肉芽组织厚度(MD=1.60, 95%CI: 1.31~1.88, P<0.000 01)、溃疡表面肉芽组织覆盖率(MD=6.03, 95%CI: 3.79~8.26, P<0.05)、溃疡表面血管内皮生长因子水平(MD=7.62, 95%CI: 1.57~13.67, P=0.01)均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义。
    结论  PRP治疗DFU具有提高愈合有效率、缩短溃疡愈合时间、促进溃疡表面肉芽组织生长、降低不良反应率的优势。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To evaluate the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) using a meta-analysis approach.
    Methods  Relevant literature on PRP for treatment of DFU was collected by searching databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, NEJM, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Database, and China Biology Medicine disc. Relevant literature on PRP for treatment of DFU was collected. The literature was read, and effect sizes were extracted. The extracted data were then subjected to a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software.
    Results  A total of 6 studies were included in this meta-analysis, involving 440 patients. Among them, there were 208 patients in experimental group (PRP combined with conventional treatment) and 232 patients in control group (conventional treatment, blank control, or placebo treatment). The ulcer healing efficacy rate in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (OR=1.29, 95%CI, 1.19 to 1.40, P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (OR=0.33, 95%CI, 0.12 to 0.93, P=0.94). The healing time (MD=-14.37, 95%CI, -23.12 to -5.62, P=0.001), thickness of granulation tissue on the ulcer surface (MD=1.60, 95%CI, 1.31 - 1.88, P < 0.000 01), coverage rate of granulation tissue on ulcer surface (MD=6.03, 95%CI, 3.79 to 8.26, P < 0.05), and level of vascular endothelial growth factor on the ulcer surface (MD=7.62, 95%CI, 1.57 to 13.67, P=0.01) in the experimental group were all superior to those in the control group.
    Conclusion  PRP treatment for DFU has the advantages of improving the ulcer healing efficacy rate, shortening the ulcer healing time, promoting the growth of granulation tissue on the ulcer surface, and reducing the incidence of adverse reactions.

     

/

返回文章
返回