序贯放化疗与同步放化疗对晚期肺癌的疗效比较及预后因素分析

Comparison of efficacy between sequential and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in treatment of advanced lung cancer and analysis of prognostic factors

  • 摘要:
    目的  比较序贯放化疗与同步放化疗在晚期肺癌治疗中的效果,并分析预后的影响因素。
    方法  选取96例晚期肺癌患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组48例。对照组接受序贯放化疗,观察组接受同步放化疗。比较2组患者治疗前后表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)水平、Karnofsky功能状态评分(KPS), 并比较2组的近期疗效、无进展生存期、生存时间和1年生存率。根据预后生存情况将晚期肺癌患者分为生存组64例和死亡组32例,采用Cox回归模型分析晚期肺癌患者预后的影响因素,并绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估联合指标的预测效能。
    结果  观察组的客观缓解率为60.42%, 疾病控制率为87.50%, 分别高于对照组的35.42%、60.42%, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后,观察组EGFR水平低于对照组, KPS高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组患者无进展生存期、生存时间长于对照组, 1年生存率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。生存组与死亡组在合并脑转移、治疗前EGFR水平、治疗前KPS及治疗方式方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析结果显示,合并脑转移、治疗前EGFR水平和治疗方式是晚期肺癌患者预后的独立影响因素(P < 0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,合并脑转移、治疗前EGFR水平和治疗方式三者联合预测晚期肺癌患者预后的曲线下面积为0.804,敏感度为0.688, 特异度为0.844。
    结论  相较于序贯放化疗,同步放化疗对晚期肺癌的疗效更佳,可降低EGFR水平,延长无进展生存期和生存时间,提高KPS和1年生存率。合并脑转移、治疗前EGFR水平和治疗方式是预后的独立影响因素,三者联合对预后具有良好的预测效能。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To compare the efficacy of sequential chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in treatment of advanced lung cancer and analyze influencing factors of prognosis.
    Methods  Ninety-six patients with advanced lung cancer were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 48 patients in each group. The control group received sequential chemoradiotherapy, while the observation group received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Additionally, the short-term efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 1-year survival rate were compared between the two groups. Based on prognostic survival, the patients were divided into survival group (n=64) and death group (n=32). The Cox regression model was used to analyze the prognostic factors in patients with advanced lung cancer, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive efficacy of combined indicators.
    Results  The objective response rate and disease control rate in the observation group were 60.42% and 87.50%, respectively, which were significantly higher than 35.42% and 60.42% in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the EGFR level in the observation groupwas lower than that in the control group, while the KPS was higher (P < 0.05). The PFS and OS in the observation group were longer than those in the control group, and the 1-year survival rate was higher (P < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between the survival and death groups in terms of concurrent brain metastases, pre-treatment EGFR level, pre-treatment KPS, and treatment modality (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that concurrent brain metastases, pre-treatment EGFR level, and treatmentmodality were independent prognostic factors for patients with advanced lung cancer (P < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for the combination of concurrent brain metastases, pre-treatment EGFR level, and treatment modality in predicting the prognosis of patients with advanced lung cancer was 0.804, with a sensitivity of 0.688 and a specificity of 0.844.
    Conclusion  Compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy is more effective in treatment of advanced lung cancer, thereby reducing EGFR levels, prolonging PFS and OS, and improving KPS and 1-year survival rate. Concurrent brain metastases, pre-treatment EGFR level, and treatment modality are independent prognostic factors, and their combination has a good predictive efficacy for prognosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回