微创旋切术联合水动力辅助吸脂技术治疗男性乳腺发育症的临床效果观察

Clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia

  • 摘要:
    目的 观察微创旋切术联合水动力辅助吸脂技术(WAL)治疗男性乳腺发育症(GYN)患者的临床效果。
    方法 回顾性分析80例GYN患者的临床资料,根据手术方式的不同将患者分成微创手术组41例和研究组39例。微创手术组采用微创旋切术治疗,研究组采用微创旋切术联合WAL治疗。观察并比较2组患者的手术指标、术后24 h疼痛程度、术后并发症情况及主观满意度。
    结果 研究组单侧手术时间短于微创手术组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05); 2组单侧切口长度、术中失血量及术后住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术后24 h疼痛程度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组术后并发症发生率为5.13%,低于微创手术组的21.95%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。研究组患者对胸部平坦无凹陷、乳房对称性的满意度得分高于微创手术组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 相较于单纯微创旋切术,对GYN患者实施微创旋切术联合WAL治疗的手术时间更短,术后并发症发生率更低,且患者对乳房外观的满意度更高。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To observe the clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction (WAL) in the treatment of gynecomastia (GYN) patients.
    Methods The clinical data of 80 GYN patients were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical
    Methods , the patients were divided into minimally invasive surgery group (41 cases) and study group (39 cases). The minimally invasive surgery group underwent minimally invasive rotational curettage, while the study group underwent minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with WAL. The surgical indicators, pain intensity 24 hours postoperatively, postoperative complications, and subjective satisfaction were observed and compared between the two groups.
    Results The unilateral surgical duration in the study group was shorter than that in the minimally invasive surgery group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in unilateral incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in pain intensity 24 hours postoperatively between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complicationsin the study group was 5.13%, which was lower than 21.95% in the minimally invasive surgery group (P < 0.05). The study group had higher satisfaction scores for chest flatness without depression and breast symmetry than the minimally invasive surgery group (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion Compared with minimally invasive rotational curettage alone, the combination of minimally invasive rotational curettage and WAL for GYN patients
    Results in shorter surgical duration, a lower incidence of postoperative complications, and higher patient satisfaction with breast appearance.

     

/

返回文章
返回