早期口腔鳞状细胞癌浸润深度及侵袭模式在评估其复发及预后中的价值

储伟明, 郭爱军, 蒋记心, 戈杰, 薛雨, 管玮

储伟明, 郭爱军, 蒋记心, 戈杰, 薛雨, 管玮. 早期口腔鳞状细胞癌浸润深度及侵袭模式在评估其复发及预后中的价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(12): 26-30, 41. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240834
引用本文: 储伟明, 郭爱军, 蒋记心, 戈杰, 薛雨, 管玮. 早期口腔鳞状细胞癌浸润深度及侵袭模式在评估其复发及预后中的价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(12): 26-30, 41. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240834
CHU Weiming, GUO Aijun, JIANG Jixin, GE Jie, XUE Yu, GUAN Wei. Value of invasion depth and invasion pattern in evaluating recurrence and prognosis of early oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(12): 26-30, 41. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240834
Citation: CHU Weiming, GUO Aijun, JIANG Jixin, GE Jie, XUE Yu, GUAN Wei. Value of invasion depth and invasion pattern in evaluating recurrence and prognosis of early oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(12): 26-30, 41. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240834

早期口腔鳞状细胞癌浸润深度及侵袭模式在评估其复发及预后中的价值

基金项目: 

江苏省常州市科技计划项目(应用基础研究)基金资助项目 CJ20220105

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    管玮, E-mail: 392512671@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: R782;R780.2;R329.2

Value of invasion depth and invasion pattern in evaluating recurrence and prognosis of early oral squamous cell carcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨早期口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)浸润深度(DOI)和侵袭模式(POI)在其复发预测和预后评价中的价值。

    方法 

    回顾性收集109例原发OSCC患者资料。临床资料分类变量的比较采用卡方检验。临床资料与肿瘤复发的相关性研究采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析。临床资料与患者总体生存期的相关性研究采用Cox回归分析。

    结果 

    单因素分析结果表明, POI、DOI和病理分级与早期OSCC复发及不良预后具有相关性。多因素Logistic回归分析显示, DOI为OSCC复发(OR=4.515, 95%CI: 1.283~15.894, P<0.05)及预后(HR=2.993, 95%CI: 1.225~7.317, P<0.05)的影响因素。OSCC的POI与DOI间有高度相关性。

    结论 

    DOI≥5 mm被认为是早期OSCC复发和不良预后的相关因素。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To investigate the value of depth of invasion (DOI) and pattern of invasion (POI) in predicting recurrence and evaluating prognosis of early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

    Methods 

    Data of 109 patients with primary OSCC were retrospectively collected. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables of clinical data. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the correlation between clinical data and tumor recurrence. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between clinical data and overall survival of patients.

    Results 

    Univariate analysis showed that POI, DOI and pathological grade were correlated with recurrence and poor prognosis of early OSCC. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that DOI was an influencing factor for OSCC recurrence (OR=4.515, 95%CI, 1.283 to 15.894, P<0.05) and prognosis (HR=2.993, 95%CI, 1.225 to 7.317, P<0.05). There was a high correlation between POI and DOI of OSCC.

    Conclusion 

    DOI ≥5 mm is considered as a relevant factor for recurrence and poor prognosis of early OSCC.

  • 图  1   OSCCPOI的形态特征

    A、B为团块状, C、D为条索状,放大倍数为40倍。

    图  2   不同POI患者的生存分析曲线

    图  3   不同DOI患者的生存分析曲线

    表  1   109例患者基线资料[n(%)]

    临床特征 分类 合计 复发(n=30) 未复发(n=79) P
    性别 59(54.1) 18(16.5) 41(37.6) 0.448
    50(45.9) 12(11.0) 38(34.9)
    年龄 <60岁 29(26.6) 6(5.5) 23(21.1) 0.228
    60~75岁 67(61.5) 18(16.5) 49(45.0)
    >75岁 13(11.9) 6(5.5) 7(6.4)
    吸烟史 52(47.7) 16(14.7) 36(33.0) 0.469
    57(52.3) 14(12.8) 43(39.5)
    饮酒史 51(46.8) 13(11.9) 38(34.9) 0.656
    58(53.2) 17(15.6) 41(37.6)
    侵袭模式 团块状 62(56.9) 10(9.2) 52(47.7) 0.002
    条索状 47(43.1) 20(18.3) 27(24.8)
    浸润深度 <5 mm 78(71.6) 14(12.8) 64(58.7) <0.001
    ≥5 mm 31(28.4) 16(14.7) 15(13.8)
    分化程度 高分化 28(25.7) 3(2.8) 25(22.9) 0.021
    中-低分化 81(74.3) 27(24.8) 54(49.5)
    发病部位 颊黏膜 38(34.9) 13(11.9) 25(22.9) 0.486
    31(28.4) 10(9.2) 21(19.3)
    牙龈 16(14.7) 3(2.8) 13(11.9)
    13(11.9) 1(0.9) 12(11.0)
    腭部 3(2.8) 1(0.9) 2(1.8)
    其他部位 8(7.3) 2(1.8) 6(5.5)
    T分期 T1 40(36.7) 8(7.3) 32(29.4) 0.181
    T2 69(63.3) 22(20.2) 47(43.1)
    治疗方式 原发灶切除术 24(22.0) 4(3.7) 20(18.3) 0.178
    原发灶切除术+ 颈部淋巴结清扫 85(78.0) 26(23.9) 59(54.1)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   临床病理特征与OSCC复发之间的单因素与多因素Logistic回归分析

    临床特征 分类 单因素Logistic回归分析 多因素Logistic回归分析
    P OR(95%CI) P OR(95%CI)
    性别
    0.449 0.719(0.306~1.689) 0.596 0.612(0.100~3.759)
    年龄 <60岁
    60~75岁 0.522 1.408(0.494~4.017) 0.735 1.246(0.349~4.443)
    >75岁 0.099 3.286(0.800~13.497) 0.935 1.081(0.168~6.968)
    吸烟史 0.469 0.733(0.315~1.702) 0.324 0.472(0.106~2.097)
    饮酒史 0.656 1.212(0.520~20.825) 0.135 3.442(0.680~17.413)
    侵袭模式 团块状 0.003 3.852(1.582~9.381) 0.069 2.985(0.919~9.696)
    条索状
    浸润深度 <5 mm 0.003 3.937(1.598~9.702) 0.019 4.515(1.283~15.894)
    ≥5 mm
    分化程度 高分化 0.029 4.167(1.154~15.040) 0.107 3.623(0.758~17.314)
    中-低分化
    发病部位 颊黏膜
    0.864 0.916(0.334~2.509) 0.711 0.797(0.239~2.650)
    牙龈 0.263 0.444(0.107~1.842) 0.074 0.188(0.030~1.179)
    0.095 0.160(0.019~1.372) 0.090 0.132(0.013~1.375)
    腭部 0.975 0.962(0.080~11.624) 0.657 0.494(0.022~11.077)
    其他部位 0.615 0.641(0.113~3.634) 0.824 0.795(0.105~6.009)
    T分期 T1 0.184 1.872(0.742~4.724) 0.357 1.726(0.540~5.512)
    T2
    治疗方式 原发灶切除术 0.185 2.203(0.685~7.088) 0.824 1.258(0.166~9.511)
    原发灶切除术+颈部淋巴结清扫
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   临床病理特征与OSCC预后之间的单因素与多因素Cox回归分析

    临床特征 分类 单因素Cox回归分析 多因素Cox回归分析
    P HR(95%CI) P HR(95%CI)
    性别
    0.564 0.804(0.384~1.684) 0.498 0.612(0.148~2.532)
    年龄 <60岁
    60~75岁 0.651 1.240(0.489~3.145) 0.872 0.920(0.335~2.531)
    >75岁 0.113 2.495(0.804~7.738) 0.728 0.792(0.212~2.952)
    吸烟史
    0.613 0.828(0.400~1.717) 0.502 0.672(0.210~2.146)
    饮酒史
    0.545 1.256(0.600~2.631) 0.116 2.616(0.789~8.677)
    侵袭模式 团块状
    条索状 0.004 3.115(1.447~6.708) 0.068 2.393(0.938~6.104)
    浸润深度 <5 mm
    ≥5 mm 0.001 3.372(1.622~7.010) 0.016 2.993(1.225~7.317)
    分化程度 高分化
    中-低分化 0.049 3.331(1.008~11.011) 0.238 2.165(0.600~7.812)
    发病部位 颊黏膜
    0.987 1.007(0.435~2.330) 0.763 0.876(0.369~2.077)
    牙龈 0.416 0.591(0.167~2.097) 0.167 0.383(0.098~1.493)
    0.137 0.213(0.028~1.635) 0.121 0.191(0.024~1.545)
    腭部 0.974 1.035(0.134~7.959) 0.814 0.762(0.079~7.358)
    其他部位 0.669 0.721(0.161~3.224) 0.854 0.859(0.169~4.363)
    T分期 T1
    T2 0.206 1.692(0.749~3.821) 0.234 1.724(0.703~4.228)
    治疗方式 原发灶切除术
    原发灶切除术+颈部淋巴结清扫 0.214 1.954(0.680~5.616) 0.854 1.164(0.229~5.915)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   OSCC的DOI及POI间的相关性分析

    肿瘤类型 侵袭模式 浸润深度 P OR(95%CI)
    <5 mm ≥5 mm
    复发/个 团块状 9 1 0.002 21.000(2.155~204.614)
    条索状 6 14
    未复发/个 团块状 46 6 0.007 4.510(1.421~14.313)
    条索状 17 10
    总数/个 团块状 55 7 <0.001 8.199(3.100~21.681)
    条索状 23 24
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492

    [2]

    ZIBELMAN M, MEHRA R. Overview of current treatment options and investigational targeted therapies for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck[J]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2016, 39(4): 396-406. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000283

    [3]

    WILLIAM W N Jr, PAPADIMITRAKOPOULOU V, LEE J J, et al. Erlotinib and the risk of oral cancer: the erlotinib prevention of oral cancer (EPOC) randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2016, 2(2): 209-216. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4364

    [4]

    CHEUNG L C, RAMADAS K, MUWONGE R, et al. Risk-based selection of individuals for oral cancer screening[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(6): 663-674. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02855

    [5]

    BOYSEN M, LÖVDAL O, TAUSJÖ J, et al. The value of follow-up in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck[J]. Eur J Cancer, 1992, 28(2/3): 426-430.

    [6]

    BÀNKFALVI A, PIFFKÒ J. Prognostic and predictive factors in oral cancer: the role of the invasive tumour front[J]. J Oral Pathol Med, 2000, 29(7): 291-298. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2000.290701.x

    [7]

    MIYATA H, YOSHIOKA A, YAMASAKI M, et al. Tumor budding in tumor invasive front predicts prognosis and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Cancer, 2009, 115(14): 3324-3334. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24390

    [8]

    RIVERA C, VENEGAS B. Histological and molecular aspects of oral squamous cell carcinoma (Review)[J]. Oncol Lett, 2014, 8(1): 7-11. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2103

    [9]

    GLEBER-NETTO F O, BRAAKHUIS B J, TRIANTAFYLLOU A, et al. Molecular events in relapsed oral squamous cell carcinoma: recurrence vs. secondary primary tumor[J]. Oral Oncol, 2015, 51(8): 738-744. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.04.016

    [10] 王昊, 赵伟, 石磊. 胃肠间质瘤组织中第10号染色体缺失的磷酸酶张力蛋白同源物基因蛋白和磷酸化蛋白激酶B蛋白的表达及其对患者预后的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(18): 53-59. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20210835
    [11] 周义志, 张忠伟, 向立斌, 等. 结直肠癌组织中Rictor蛋白的表达及其与临床病理特征、预后的关系[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(15): 80-83, 88. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20220770
    [12] 楚晨, 薛雨, 闫周, 等. cT1N0M0口腔鳞状细胞癌浸润深度对预测淋巴结转移和评价预后的影响[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2024, 34(1): 40-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KQHM202401005.htm
    [13]

    AMBROSCH P, KRON M, FISCHER G, et al. Micrometastases in carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: detection, risk of metastasizing, and prognostic value of depth of invasion[J]. Head Neck, 1995, 17(6): 473-479. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880170604

    [14]

    DANG R R, KIM J, QURESHI M M, et al. Impact of depth of invasion on local recurrence in R0 resected node-negative oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Head Neck, 2023, 45(3): 561-566. doi: 10.1002/hed.27264

    [15]

    NEWMAN M, DZIEGIELEWSKI P T, NGUYEN N T A, et al. Relationship of depth of invasion to survival outcomes and patterns of recurrence for T3 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Oral Oncol, 2021, 116: 105195. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105195

    [16]

    YAMAMOTO E, MIYAKAWA A, KOHAMA G. Mode of invasion and lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity[J]. Head Neck Surg, 1984, 6(5): 938-947. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890060508

    [17]

    WU K L, WEI J S, LIU Z W, et al. Can pattern and depth of invasion predict lymph node relapse and prognosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1): 714. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5859-y

    [18]

    KOPECKÁ K, PINK R. Pattern of invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma and its relation to the presence of nodal metastases- a review[J]. Acta Chir Plast, 2023, 65(1): 28-33.

    [19]

    CHU W M, SONG X M, YANG X M, et al. Neuropilin-1 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by stimulating nuclear factor-kappa B and is associated with poor prognosis in human oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e101931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101931

    [20]

    BILOTTA M T, ANTIGNANI A, FITZGERALD D J. Managing the TME to improve the efficacy of cancer therapy[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 954992. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.954992

    [21]

    PENG C, XU Y L, WU J, et al. TME-related biomimetic strategies against cancer[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2024, 19: 109-135. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S441135

    [22]

    PU Y M, DING L, WANG Y J, et al. Biopsy pattern of invasion type to determine the surgical approach in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Virchows Arch, 2021, 479(1): 109-119. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03008-y

图(3)  /  表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  134
  • HTML全文浏览量:  46
  • PDF下载量:  10
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-02-29
  • 修回日期:  2024-05-06
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-06-28
  • 刊出日期:  2024-06-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回