可溶性晚期糖基化终产物受体、白细胞介素-36γ在桥本甲状腺炎患者血清中的表达及意义

Expression and significance of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and interleukin-36γ in serum of patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨可溶性晚期糖基化终产物受体(sRAGE)、白细胞介素-36γ(IL-36γ)在桥本甲状腺炎(HT)患者血清中的表达及其临床意义。
    方法 选取180例疑似HT人员作为研究对象,根据最终诊断结果分为HT组137例和非HT组43例。依据血清免疫球蛋白G4(IgG4)水平,将HT组患者进一步分为IgG4相关性HT组(IgG4≥135 mg/dL)和非IgG4相关性HT组(IgG4 < 135 mg/dL)。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法检测所有研究对象的血清sRAGE、IL-36γ水平; 绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析血清sRAGE、IL-36γ水平对HT及其IgG4表型的诊断价值。
    结果 HT组患者血清sRAGE水平低于非HT组,血清IL-36γ水平高于非HT组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001); IgG4相关性HT组患者血清sRAGE水平低于非IgG4相关性HT组,血清IL-36γ水平高于非IgG4相关性HT组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清sRAGE、IL-36γ联合诊断HT的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.900(95%CI: 0.846~0.939), 诊断效能显著高于两者单独诊断(P < 0.05); 血清sRAGE、IL-36γ联合诊断HT患者IgG4表型的AUC为0.897(95%CI: 0.934~0.943),诊断效能显著高于两者单独诊断(P < 0.05)。
    结论 HT患者血清sRAGE水平显著降低,血清IL-36γ水平显著升高,联合检测血清sRAGE、IL-36γ水平可有效诊断HT并评估IgG4表型。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore expression and significance in serum levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and interleukin-36 (IL-36) in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT).
    Methods A total of 180 individuals suspected of HT were enrolled as study subjects and divided into HT group (n=137) and non-HT group (n=43) based on final diagnostic outcomes. Within the HT group, patients were further divided into serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related HT group (IgG4≥135 mg/dL) and non-IgG4-related HT group (IgG4 < 135 mg/dL) according to serum IgG4 levels. Serum levels of sRAGE and IL-36γ were measured in all subjects using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the diagnostic value of serum sRAGE and IL-36γ levels forHT and its IgG4 phenotype.
    Results Serum sRAGE levels were significantly lower in the HT group compared to the non-HT group, while serum IL-36γ levels were significantly higher (P < 0.001). Patients in the IgG4-related HT group had significantly lower serum sRAGE levels and higher serum IL-36γ levels compared to those in the non-IgG4-related HT group (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the combined diagnosis of serum sRAGE and IL-36γ for HT had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.900 (95%CI, 0.846 to 0.939), demonstrating significantly higher diagnostic efficiency than either indicator (P < 0.05). For the IgG4 phenotype in HT patients, the combined AUC of serum sRAGE and IL-36γ was 0.897 (95%CI, 0.934 to 0.943), which also significantly higher than individual indicator (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion Serum sRAGE levels are significantly decreased, while serum IL-36γ levels are significantly increased in HT patients. Combined detection of serum sRAGE and IL-36γ levels can effectively diagnose HT and assess the IgG4 phenotype.

     

/

返回文章
返回