超声引导下动脉穿刺在血气分析采血困难患者中的应用

Application of ultrasound-guided arterial puncture in patients with difficulty in blood collection for blood gas analysis

  • 摘要:
    目的  探讨超声引导下股动脉、桡动脉穿刺在血气分析动脉采血困难患者中应用的安全性及可行性。
    方法  选取行血气分析的采血困难患者200例,随机分为对照组和试验组,每组100例。试验组又分为采用超声引导下股动脉穿刺50例(试验A组),采用超声引导下桡动脉穿刺50例(试验B组)。对照组又分为采用传统股动脉穿刺50例(对照A组),采用传统桡动脉穿刺50例(对照B组)。评估采血成功率、采血时间、疼痛评分、患者满意度和并发症等指标。
    结果  试验A组与对照A组比较,采血成功率分别为100%(50/50)与94%(47/50), 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 采血时间分别为(36.68±12.76) s与(64.78±15.81) s, 疼痛评分分别为(1.74±0.88)分与(2.60±0.90)分,患者满意度分别为(8.74±1.07)分与(7.68±1.53)分,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。试验B组与对照B组比较,采血成功率分别为100%(50/50)与98%(49/50), 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 采血时间分别为(34.92±11.41) s与(60.92±16.91) s, 疼痛评分分别为(1.64±0.72)分与(2.42±0.86)分,患者满意度分别为(8.66±0.89)分与(8.04±1.11)分,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在皮下出血和血肿等并发症方面,试验A组与对照A组、试验B组与对照B组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论  超声引导下桡动脉、股动脉穿刺采血在采血困难患者,特别是肥胖患者中具有优势,能提高采血准确度及速度,减轻疼痛,提升患者满意度。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To explore the safety and feasibility of ultrasound-guided femoral and radial artery puncture in patients with difficulty in arterial blood collection for blood gas analysis.
    Methods  A total of 200 patients with difficulty in blood collection for blood gas analysis were selected and randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 100 cases in each group. In the experimental group, 50 patients treated with ultrasound-guided femoral artery puncture were included in experimental group A, and 50 patients treated with ultrasound-guided radial artery puncture were included in experimental group B. In the control group, 50 patients treated with traditional femoral artery puncture were included in control group A, and 50 patients treated with traditional radial artery puncture were included in control group B. The success rate of blood collection, collection time, pain score, patient's satisfaction degree and complications were evaluated.
    Results  The success rates of blood collection of experimental group A and control group A were 100% (50/50) and 94% (47/50) respectively, with no significant statistical difference (P>0.05); the collection time of experimental group A and control group A was (36.68±12.76) and (64.78±15.81) seconds respectively, the pain score was (1.74±0.88) and (2.60±0.90) points respectively, the patient's satisfaction degree was (8.74±1.07) and (7.68±1.53) points respectively, and all the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the comparison between experimental group B and control group B, the success rates of blood collection were 100%(50/50) and 98%(49/50) respectively, with no significant statistical difference (P>0.05); the collection time of experimental group B and control group B was (34.92±11.41) and (60.92±16.91) seconds respectively, the pain score was (1.64±0.72) and (2.42±0.86) points respectively, the patient's satisfaction degree was (8.66±0.89) and (8.04±1.11) points respectively, and all the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in complications such as subcutaneous bleeding and hematoma between experimental group A and control group A as well as experimental group B and control group B.
    Conclusion  Ultrasound-guided femoral and radial artery puncture has significant advantages in patients with difficulty in blood collection, especially in obese patients, which can improve the accuracy and speed of blood collection, reduce the pain, and increase patients' satisfaction degree.

     

/

返回文章
返回