经阴道超声血流参数联合血清抗苗勒管激素对多囊卵巢综合征不孕症体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠失败的预测价值

Predictive value of transvaginal ultrasound blood flow parameters combined with serum anti-mullerian hormone for in vitro fertilization embryo transfer pregnancy failure in polycystic ovary syndrome infertility

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨经阴道超声血流参数联合血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)对多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)不孕症体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)妊娠失败的预测价值。
    方法 选取行IVF-ET的173例PCOS不孕症患者为研究对象, 其中脱落12例。根据胚胎移植后第28天阴道B超结果将161例患者分为妊娠失败组(n=96)与妊娠成功组(n=65)。比较2组阻力指数(RI)、搏动指数(PI)、收缩与舒张末期最大血流速度比值(S/D)和血清AMH水平。采用多因素Logistic回归分析法分析PCOS不孕症IVF-ET妊娠失败的影响因素。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析RI、PI、S/D、血清AMH水平单独及联合评估对PCOS不孕症患者IVF-ET妊娠失败的预测价值。
    结果 妊娠失败组血清AMH水平低于妊娠成功组,血流RI、PI、S/D高于妊娠成功组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。RI(OR=4.688, 95%CI: 2.878~6.498)、PI(OR=4.332, 95%CI: 2.277~6.387)、S/D(OR=3.773, 95%CI: 1.856~5.691)、月经第3天黄体生成素(LH)/促卵泡生成素(FSH)值(OR=2.998,95%CI: 1.236~4.760)高是PCOS不孕症IVF-ET妊娠失败的危险因素(P < 0.05); 月经第3天FSH水平高(OR=0.579, 95%CI: 0.416~0.806)、血清AMH水平高(OR=0.722, 95%CI: 0.533~0.911)及人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)日子宫内膜厚(OR=0.632, 95%CI: 0.421~0.843)是PCOS不孕症IVF-ET妊娠失败的保护因素(P < 0.05)。RI、PI、S/D联合血清AMH水平预测PCOS不孕症IVF-ET妊娠失败的灵敏度、特异度、曲线下面积(AUC)分别为95.83%、80.00%、0.933。
    结论 超声血流参数联合AMH对PCOS不孕症IVF-ET妊娠失败具有较好的预测价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the predictive value of transvaginal ultrasound blood flow parameters combined with serum anti mullerian hormone (AMH) for in vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) pregnancy failure in infertility with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
    Methods A total of 173 infertile PCOS patients who underwent IVF-ET were selected as the study objects, of which 12 cases fell off. According to the results of vaginal Bultrasound on the 28th day after embryo transfer, 161 patients were divided into failed pregnancy group (n=96) and successful pregnancy group (n=65). The levels of resistance index (RI), pulsatile index (PI), ratio of maximum systolic to diastolic blood flow velocity (S/D), and serum AMH were compared between the two groups. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of pregnancy failure in IVF-ET with PCOS infertility. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to analyze RI, PI, S/D and serum AMH levels alone and their combination to evaluate the predictive valueof IVF-ET pregnancy failure in PCOS infertility patients.
    Results The serum AMH level in the failed pregnancy group was significantly lower than that in the successful pregnancy group, and the blood flow RI, PI and S/D were higher than those in the successful pregnancy group (P < 0.001). RI (OR=4.688, 95%CI, 2.878 to 6.498), PI (OR=4.332, 95%CI, 2.277 to 6.387), S/D (OR=3.773, 95%CI, 1.856 to 5.691) and luteinizing hormone (LH)/follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) values on the third day of menstrual cycle (OR=2.998, 95%CI, 1.236 to 4.760) were the risk factors for pregnancy failure in PCOS infertility IVF-ET (P < 0.05); high FSH level on the third day of menstruation (OR=0.579, 95%CI, 0.416 to 0.806), high serum AMH level (OR=0.722, 95%CI, 0.533 to 0.911) and endometrial thickness on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)day (OR=0.632, 95%CI, 0.421 to 0.843) were protective factors for pregnancy failure in IVF-ET in PCOS infertility (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of RI, PI and S/D combined with serum AMH levels in predicting pregnancy failure in IVF-ET of PCOS infertility were 95.83%, 80.00% and 0.933, respectively.
    Conclusion The combination of ultrasonic blood flow parameters and AMH has a good value in predicting pregnancy failure in IVF-ET of PCOS infertility.

     

/

返回文章
返回