子午流注纳子法耳穴贴压在膝骨关节炎护理中的应用研究

Application of auricular pressing therapy of midnight-midday ebb flow Nazi method in nursing of knee osteoarthritis

  • 摘要:
    目的  探讨子午流注纳子法耳穴贴压对膝骨关节炎的疗效。
    方法  选取102例非手术膝骨关节患者为研究对象, 随机分为观察组(51例)和对照组(51例)。对照组给予常规磁珠耳穴贴压,观察组行子午流注纳子法耳穴贴压,比较2组患者干预2、4、6周后的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、膝关节功能评分以及干预6周后匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分。
    结果  2组患者干预2、4、6周后VAS评分均低于干预前,膝关节功能评分均高于干预前,且观察组各个时点疼痛、膝关节功能改善程度优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05); 干预6周后,观察组患者PSQI评分低于对照组和干预前,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论  子午流注纳子法耳穴贴压可缓解膝骨关节炎患者疼痛,改善膝关节功能,提高睡眠质量。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To explore the therapeutic effect of auricular pressing therapy of midnight-midday ebb flow Nazi method in nursing of knee osteoarthritis.
    Methods  A total of 102 non-surgical patients with knee osteoarthritis were selected and randomly divided into observation group (51 cases) and control group (51 cases). The control group received conventional magnetic bead auricular acupressure, while the observation group received auricular pressing therapy of midnight-midday ebb flow Nazi method. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, knee joint function scores, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores were compared between the two groups at weeks of 2, 4, and 6 after intervention.
    Results  After 2, 4, and 6 weeks of intervention, the VAS scores of both groups were lower than before intervention, and the knee joint function scores were higher than before intervention, and the improvement in pain and knee joint function in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group (P < 0.05). At week 6 after intervention, the PSQI scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group and before intervention (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion  Auricular pressing therapy of midnight-midday ebb flow Nazi method can effectively relieve pain, improve knee joint function, and enhance sleep quality in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

     

/

返回文章
返回