急性前循环闭塞患者血管内治疗后无效再通的多因素分析

Multivariate analysis of futile recanalization after intravascular therapy in patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨急性前循环闭塞患者血管内治疗后无效再通的发生率和危险因素。
    方法 回顾性分析2015年8月—2021年12月南通大学附属医院脑卒中中心登记系统内176例急性前循环闭塞患者的临床资料。患者均接受血管内治疗成功实现血管造影再通改良脑梗死溶栓(mTICI)分级≥2b,并根据术后90 d功能独立性分为无效再通组改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为3~6分和有效再通组(mRS评分为0~2分)。采用Logistic回归分析确定血管内治疗后无效再通的预测因素。
    结果 176例患者中,93例患者发生无效再通,83例患者为有效再通。无效再通组与有效再通组患者在年龄、性别、心房颤动、入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、缺血时间、桥接治疗、出血转化等方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因量Logistic回归分析显示,入院高NIHSS评分(OR=0.815,95%CI:0.760~0.874,P < 0.001)和缺血时间(OR=1.232,95%CI:1.020~1.488,P=0.030)是无效再通的独立预测因素。
    结论 急性前循环闭塞患者血管内治疗后无效再通的发生率较高,而年龄、性别、心房颤动、入院高NIHSS评分、缺血时间、桥接治疗和出血转化是AIS患者行血管内治疗无效再通的危险因素,其中入院高NIHSS评分和缺血时间是AIS患者血管内治疗后无效再通的独立预测因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the incidence and risk factors of futile recanalization after intravascular therapy in patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion.
    Methods Clinical materials of 176 patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion in the registration system of the Stroke Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from August 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients received intravascular therapy to successfully achieve angiographic recanalizationgrade of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) ≥ 2b, and were divided into futile recanalization group score of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was 3 to 6 points and effective recanalization group (mRS score was 0 to 2 points) based on functional independence at 90 days after surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of futile recanalization after intravascular treatment.
    Results In the 176 patients, 93 patients had futile recanalization, and 83 patients had effective recanalization. There were significant differences in age, gender, atrial fibrillation, score of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on hospital admission, ischemic time, bridging treatment and hemorrhagic transformation between the futile recanalization group and the effective recanalization group (P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that high NIHSS score on hospital admission (OR=0.815, 95%CI, 0.760 to 0.874, P < 0.001) and ischemic time (OR=1.232, 95%CI, 1.020 to 1.488, P=0.030) were the independent predictors of futile recanalization.
    Conclusion The incidence of futile recanalization after intravascular treatment is relatively high in patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion, while age, gender, atrial fibrillation, high NIHSS score on hospital admission, ischemic time, bridging treatment and hemorrhagic transformation are the risk factors for futile recanalization after intravascular treatment in AIS patients, and high NIHSS score on hospital admission and ischemic time are the independent predictive factors for futile recanalization after intravascular treatment in AIS patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回