院前院内协同救治模式对急性脑梗死患者的效果观察

Effect of pre-hospital and intra-hospital collaborative therapeutic model in the treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction

  • 摘要:
    目的 观察院前院内协同救治模式对急性脑梗死患者的效果。
    方法 选取67例急性脑梗死患者为研究对象,根据救治模式分为观察组(n=37)与对照组(n=30)。对照组采取传统救治模式,观察组采取院前院内协同救治模式。比较2组静脉溶栓时间效率、早期神经功能恢复情况及氧化应激指标。
    结果 2组患者发病到就诊时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者就诊到溶栓时间及就诊到签署静脉溶栓知情同意书时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。入院时,2组患者美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);入院后7 d、溶栓后90 d时,观察组患者NIHSS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者血清谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)、丙二醛(MDA)水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者血清超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组有1例患者死亡,病死率为3.33%;观察组中未发生死亡情况。
    结论 院前院内协同救治模式可有效提升急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓时间效率,减轻神经功能损伤,降低氧化应激反应程度及死亡风险。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To observe the effect of pre-hospital and intra-hospital collaborative therapeutic model in the treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction.
    Methods A total of 67 patients with acute cerebral infarction were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into observation group (n=37) and control group (n=30) according to the therapeutic model. The control group was conducted with the traditional therapeutic model, while the observation group was conducted with the pre-hospital and intra-hospital collaborative therapeutic model. The time efficiency of intravenous thrombolysis, early recovery of nerve function and oxidative stress indexes were compared between the two groups.
    Results There was no significant difference in the time from onset to visit between the two groups (P > 0.05); the time from seeing a doctor to thrombolysis and the time from seeing a doctor to signing the informed consent for intravenous thrombolysis in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). On the hospital admission, there was no significant difference in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score between the two groups (P > 0.05); at the time points of 7 days after admission and 90 days after thrombolysis, the NIHSS scores of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of serum glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and malonaldehyde (MDA) between the two groups (P > 0.05); the level of serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). One patient died in the control group, with a mortality rate of 3.33%; no patient died in the observation group.
    Conclusion Pre-hospital and intra-hospital collaborative therapeutic model can effectively improve the time efficiency of intravenous thrombolysis for patients with acute cerebral infarction, alleviate the neurological damage, and reduce degree of oxidative stress reaction and death risk.

     

/

返回文章
返回