上皮性卵巢癌患者肿瘤细胞减灭术术后复发的影响因素

Influence factors for recurrence of cytoreductive surgery in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨术前新辅助化疗联合肿瘤细胞减灭术(CRS)治疗卵巢癌患者术后1年内复发的影响因素。
    方法 选取行CRS治疗的卵巢癌患者90例作为研究对象。化疗结束后随访1年,以是否复发将卵巢癌患者分为复发组(n=54)和无复发组(n=36)。比较2组的一般资料(年龄、分期等)、术式(开腹、腹腔镜等)等情况,然后利用多元回归分析来对上皮性卵巢癌患者CRS化疗结束后随访1年复发的独立危险因素进行分析,并以相关危险因素建立卵巢癌CRS治疗预后的预测模型。
    结果 术前,复发组高分期患者占比高于未复发组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。未复发组患者清扫淋巴结比例高于复发组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。复发组的血清糖类抗原125(CA125)、人附睾蛋白4(HE4)、癌胚抗原(CEA)及抗缪勒氏管激素(AMH)水平均高于无复发组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多元回归分析结果显示,年龄、术前分期、清扫淋巴结及术前血清CA125、HE4、CEA、AMH均为上皮性卵巢癌患者CRS术后1年复发的影响因素(因果关系)或关联影响因素(果因关系)(P < 0.05)。上皮性卵巢癌患者CRS术后1年内复发的预测价值分析结果显示,术前血清CA125、HE4、CEA和AMH单独及联合预测的曲线下面积(AUC, 95%CI)分别为0.740(0.516~0.937)、0.730(0.467~0.990)、0.731(0.477~0.977)、0.743(0.515~0.967)和0.884(0.829~0.924)。
    结论 上皮性卵巢癌患者在术前新辅助化疗时,应对血清CA125、HE4、CEA和AMH水平进行监测。术前血清CA125、HE4、CEA、AMH联合预测的AUC高于上述指标单独预测,构建预估风险模型可以提高对上皮性卵巢癌患者CRS术后1年内复发的预测价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the influence factors for recurrence of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in treatment of patients with ovarian cancer within one year after surgery.
    Methods Ninety patients with ovarian cancer who underwent CRS treatment were selected as the study objects. Patients with ovarian cancer were followed up for one year after chemotherapy and divided into recurrence group (n=54) and no recurrence group (n=36). The general data (age, stage, etc.) and operation type (laparotomy, laparoscopy, etc.) of the two groups were compared. Then multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the independent risk factors for recurrence in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer after one year follow-up after CRS chemotherapy. The prognostic model of CRS treatment for ovarian cancer was established based on related risk factors.
    Results Before operation, the proportion of patients with high stage in the recurrence group was significantly higher than that in the no recurrence group (P < 0.05). The proportion of lymph node dissection in the no recurrence group was significantly higher than that in the recurrence group (P < 0.05). The levels of serum carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125), human epididymal protein 4(HE4), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in the recurrence group were significantly higher than those in the no recurrence group (P < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that age, preoperative stage, lymph node dissection and preoperative serum CA125, HE4, CEA and AMH were all influential factors (causality) or association factors (causality) for the recurrence of CRS one year after operation in epithelial ovarian cancer patients (P < 0.05). The analysis of predictive value of CRS in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer at one year after surgery showed that the area under the curve (AUC, 95%CI) of preoperative serum CA125, HE4, CEA and AMH alone and joint prediction were 0.740 (0.516 to 0.937), 0.730 (0.467 to 0.990), 0.731 (0.477 to 0.977), 0.743 (0.515 to 0.967) and 0.884 (0.829 to 0.924), respectively.
    Conclusion Serum CA125, HE4, CEA and AMH levels should be monitored in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer during preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The AUC predicted by the combination of serum CA125, HE4, CEA, and AMH before surgery is higher than that predicted by the above indicators alone. Building a predictive risk model can improve the value of predicting the recurrence of CRS in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer within one year after surgery.

     

/

返回文章
返回