俯卧位不同摆放方式对胸腰椎手术患者体位相关并发症的影响

Effects of different postures in prone position on postural complications in patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgery

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨俯卧位不同摆放方式对胸腰椎手术患者术中血液循环的影响及预防压力性损伤(PI)的效果。
    方法 选取2020年4月-2021年2月87例行胸腰椎后路椎间融合器植入植骨融合术患者, 将其随机分成观察组42例和对照组45例。比较2组患者深静脉血栓(DVT)、PI情况。分别记录摆俯卧位前平卧时(T0)、摆放俯卧位稳定后即刻(T1)、手术0.5 h(T2)、手术1 h(T3)、手术1.5 h(T4)、手术2 h(T5)、手术结束缝皮时(T6)、手术结束恢复仰卧位稳定后即刻(T7)时点下肢静脉压(LEVP)、心率、平均动脉压。
    结果 与T0时点比较, 观察组患者T1~T6时点的LEVP均较高, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05); 与T0时点比较, 对照组患者T1~T7时点的LEVP均较高, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2组T1、T7时点LEVP与T0时点LEVP的差值(ΔLEVP)比较, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组下肢DVT发生例数1例, 未发生者41例; 对照组下肢DVT发生例数7例, 未发生者38例。2组患者术后3 d下肢DVT发生率比较, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组左侧和右侧髂部PI发生率较对照组低, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 2组PI严重程度均为Ⅰ期。2组头面部、前胸部、膝部的PI发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组胸腰椎手术患者俯卧位不同时点心率、平均动脉压以及出血量、手术时间比较, 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论 俯卧位胸腰椎手术患者下肢低角度摆放较传统角度能有效减小手术对下肢静脉血液回流的影响, 有利于DVT的预防。分散俯卧位支撑点面积能够减轻髂部压力, 显著降低PI的发生率。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To investigate the effects of different postures in prone position on intraoperative blood circulation in patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgery and its impact in preventing pressure injury (PI).
    Methods  A total of 87 patients who underwent posterior thoracolumbar interbody fusion implant from April 2020 to February 2021 were selected and randomly divided into observation group (42 cases) and control group (45 cases). Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PI were compared between the two groups. Lower extremity venous pressure (LEVP), heart rate and mean arterial pressure at supine position before prone position (T0), immediately after prone position stabilization (T1), 0.5h after operation (T2), 1 hafter operation (T3), 1.5h after operation (T4) and 2h after operation (T5), at the end of surgery (T6) and immediately after stability of returning the supine position following the operation (T7) were respectively recorded.
    Results  Compared with T0, values of LEVP at time points from T1to T6 in the observation group were higher (P < 0.05). Compared with T0, values of LEVP at time points from T1 to T7 in the control group were higher (P < 0.05). The difference values of LEVP between T1 and T0 as well as between T7 and T0 (ΔLEVP) were statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). In the observation group, DVT occurred in 1 case and did not occur in 41 cases. In the control group, 7 cases of DVT occurred and 38 cases had no DVT. There was statistical significance in the incidence of lower extremity DVT 3d after operation between two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of PI in the left and right iliac parts of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The severity of PI in both groups was stage Ⅰ. There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of PI in the head and face, anterior chest and the knees in two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, blood loss and operation time between two groups in prone position at different time points (P>0.05).
    Conclusion  Lower angle placement of lower extremity in prone position for thoracolumbar surgery patients can effectively reduce the effect of operation on venous blood reflux in lower limbs compared with the traditional angle, which is conducive to the prevention of DVT. Dispersing the area of support points in the prone position reduces the pressure on the iliac bone and significantly reduces the occurrence of PI.

     

/

返回文章
返回