失效模式与效应分析在神经外科患者中线导管风险管理中的应用

Application of failure mode and effect analysis in risk management of midline catheter of patients in neurosurgical department

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)在神经外科患者中线导管(MC)风险管理中的应用价值。
    方法 将2020年6月—2021年3月收治的106例MC置管患者设为对照组,实施常规护理; 将2021年4月—2022年1月收治的114例MC置管患者设为观察组,在常规护理基础上实施FMEA管理,查找既往置管维护操作流程、制度管理中存在的失效模式及潜在风险因素,计算失效模式的优先风险数值(RPN), 制订神经外科患者MC置管穿刺与维护操作的规范化管理方案。观察并比较2组患者MC置管维护失效模式的RPN评分、MC置管维护相关并发症发生率、非计划性拔管发生率和患者满意度。
    结果  观察组置管前评估不足、置管不规范及预处理不当、日常应用维护不当、交接巡视不够、镇静约束不当和患者自我管理不强这6种MC置管维护失效模式的RPN评分依次为(150.02±11.68)、(113.01±7.35)、(210.43±8.65)、(180.00±24.70)、(142.21±4.12)、(115.81±13.04)分,分别低于对照组的(291.93±28.04)、(279.14±9.03)、(411.90±23.28)、(322.81±21.58)、(254.62±20.38)、(202.40±30.32)分,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05); 观察组患者MC相关并发症(出血、肿胀、移位、静脉炎、堵管)的总发生率为10.53%(12/114), 非计划性拔管发生率为0.88%(1/114), 分别低于对照组的23.58%(25/106)、2.83%(3/106), 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05); 观察组患者满意度为92.98%, 高于对照组的83.02%, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论  将FMEA应用于神经外科患者MC风险管理中,可建立标准化安全管理模式,有效降低MC相关并发症及非计划性拔管发生率,并提高患者满意度,为神经外科患者MC风险管理提供临床实践循证依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the application value of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in the risk management of midline catheter (MC) in patients of neurosurgical department.
    Methods  A total of 106 patients with MC catheterization admitted from June 2020 to March 2021 were selected as control group and received routine nursing. A total of 114 patients with MC catheterization admitted from April 2021 to January 2022 were assigned to observation group, and FMEA management was implemented on the basis of routine nursing. The failure modes and potential risk factors existing in the operation process and system management of previous catheterization maintenance were found out, the priority risk value (RPN) of the failure mode was calculated, and a standardized management plan for MC catheterization, puncture and maintenance in patients of neurosurgery department was formulated. The RPN score of MC catheterization maintenance failure mode, the incidence of MC catheterization maintenance related complications, the incidence of unplanned extubation and patients′ satisfaction were observed and compared between the two groups.
    Results  After the FMEA intervention, the RPN scores of incomplete evaluation, non-standardized operation, improper pretreatment, improper daily application and maintenance, inadequate handover patrol, improper restraint for sedation and poor patient self-management were (150.02±11.68), (113.01±7.35), (210.43±8.65), (180.00±24.70), (142.21±4.12) and (115.81±13.04) respectively, which were lower than (291.93±28.04), (279.14±9.03), (411.90±23.28), (322.81±21.58), (254.62±20.38) and (202.40±30.32) in the control group(P < 0.05). The total incidence of MC-related complications (bleeding, swelling, displacement, phlebitis, tube blocking) in the observation group was 10.53% (12/114), and the incidence of unplanned extubation was 0.88%(1/114), which were lower than 23.58%(25/106) and 2.83%(3/106), respectively in the control group (P < 0.05). The patients′ satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that in the control group(92.98% versus 83.02%, P < 0.05).
    Conclusion  The application of FMEA in MC risk management of neurosurgical patients can establish standardized safety management model, effectively reduce the incidence rates of MC-related complications and unplanned extubation, improve patients′ satisfaction, and provide evidence-based basis for clinical practice for MC risk management of patients in neurosurgical department.

     

/

返回文章
返回