超声检查评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的准确性及影响因素分析

Accuracy of ultrasonic evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and analysis of influencing factors

  • 摘要:
    目的 判断超声检查评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)效果及残余病灶大小的准确性, 并分析影响评估准确性的因素。
    方法 本研究纳入260例行NAC的浸润性乳腺癌患者,计算所有患者术前超声检查测量肿瘤最大径与术后病理最大径的差异,并分析两者的相关性及影响两者差异的临床病理学特征。
    结果 260例患者中共78例获得病理学完全缓解(pCR), 超声评估乳腺癌NAC后pCR的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为82.1%、88.4%、75.3%和86.3%。NAC后超声所测肿瘤最大直径为(19.8±14.3) mm, 术后病理所测残余癌最大直径为(17.9±16.3) mm。超声所测肿瘤最大直径与术后病理所测残余癌最大直径显著相关(r=0.721, P < 0.001)。肿块边缘、后方回声、钙化、组织学分级、ER表达状态等临床病理特征对NAC后超声与病理评估肿瘤残余病灶大小一致性影响显著(P < 0.05)。超声与病理检查评估边缘尚光整、后方回声无改变、肿块内无钙化、组织学分级低和ER阴性的一致性较好。
    结论 肿块内无钙化、边缘相对光整、后方回声无改变、雌激素受体阴性、组织学分级低的乳腺癌患者超声检查评估NAC疗效的准确度较高,可有效帮助临床医生于术前准确确定保乳患者的手术范围,并为其制订个体化诊疗方案。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To judge the accuracy of ultrasound examination in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the size of residual lesion, and to analyze the factors influencing of accuracy of evaluation.
    Methods A total of 260 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent NAC were enrolled to calculate the differences between the preoperative maximum tumor diameter measured by ultrasound and the postoperative maximum pathological diameter of all patients, and their correlation and the clinicopathological features influencing the difference between them were analyzed.
    Results Of 260 patients, 78 patients obtained pathological complete response (pCR). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of pCR after ultrasound assessment of NAC were 82.1%, 88.4%, 75.3% and 86.3%, respectively. The maximum diameter of the tumor measured by ultrasound after NAC was (19.8±14.3) mm, and the maximum diameter of the residual tumor measured by postoperative pathology was (17.9±16.3) mm. The maximum tumor diameter measured by ultrasound was significantly correlated with the maximum residual tumor diameter measured by postoperative pathology (r=0.721, P < 0.001). Clinicopathological features such as mass margin, posterior echo, calcification, histological grade and ER expression state had significant influence on the consistency of residual lesion size by NAC ultrasound and pathological evaluation (P < 0.05). Ultrasound and histopathological assessment showed a good agreement in evaluating tumor with smooth margin, no change in posterior echo, no calcification in the mass, low histological grade, and negative for ER.
    Conclusion In breast cancer patients with no calcification in the tumor, relatively smooth edge, no change in posterior echo, negative estrogen receptor, and low histological grade, ultrasound evaluation of NAC efficacy have higher accuracy, which can effectively help clinicians accurately determine the surgical scope of breast-preserving patients before surgery and formulate individual diagnosis and treatment plans.

     

/

返回文章
返回