静脉用药调配中心使用前后不合理医嘱及药物干预比较研究

Comparison in unreasonable medical orders and drug intervention before and after application of pharmacy intravenous admixture services

  • 摘要:
      目的  回顾性分析比较静脉用药调配中心(PIVAS)投入使用前后不合理医嘱情况,探讨药物干预措施。
      方法  选取2021年4—6月PIVAS投入使用前静脉输液医嘱36 382条为对照组,选取2021年7—9月PIVAS投入使用后通过药师审核的静脉输液医嘱26 156条为实验组。回顾性统计和分析不合理医嘱情况。
      结果  PIVAS投入使用前不合理用药医嘱3 118条,医嘱不合理率8.57%; PIVAS投入使用后不合理用药医嘱186条,医嘱不合理率0.71%。医嘱不合理原因主要为溶媒选取不适宜、给药浓度不适宜、给药剂量不适宜、给药频次不适宜、配伍不适宜。
      结论  PIVAS投入使用后,审方药师集中审核医嘱并采取有效措施干预不合理医嘱,医嘱不合理用药比例显著降低,为PIVAS模式应用提供了数据支持。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To compare the situation of unreasonable medical orders before and after the application of pharmacy intravenous admixture services (PIVAS) by retrospective analysis method, and to explore the drug interventions.
      Methods  A total of 36 382 intravenous transfusion orders before application of PIVAS from April to June 2021 were selected as control group, and 26 156 intravenous infusion orders verified by pharmacists after application of PIVAS from July to September 2021 were selected as experimental group. Retrospective statistics and analysis were used to analyze unreasonable medical orders.
      Results  Before application of PIVAS, there were 3 118 unreasonable medical orders, and the unreasonable rate of medical orders was 8.57%; after application of PIVAS, there were 186 unreasonable medical orders, and the unreasonable rate of medical orders was 0.71%. The main reasons for unreasonable medical orders were inappropriate solvent selection, inappropriate drug concentration, inappropriate dosage, inappropriate drug frequency and inappropriate compatibility.
      Conclusion  After the application of PIVAS, the pharmacists review the medical orders and take effective measures to intervene the unreasonable medical orders, and the proportion of unreasonable drug use is significantly reduced, which provide data support for the application of PIVAS mode.

     

/

返回文章
返回