3种固定术治疗骨盆前环骨折的效果比较

Comparison of three fixation methods in treating anterior pelvic ring fractures

  • 摘要:
      目的  观察改良Stoppa入路内固定与外固定及微创经骨膜外钢板内固定术治疗骨盆前环骨折的效果。
      方法  回顾性分析98例骨盆前环骨折患者的临床资料,根据治疗方式不同分为A组、B组和C组,A组33例接受改良Stoppa入路内固定治疗,B组31例接受外固定架治疗,C组34例接受微创经骨膜外钢板内固定术治疗。比较3组手术相关指标、术后骨折复位情况、临床疗效、并发症发生率。
      结果  3组切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。A、C组骨折复位情况、临床总有效率优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),但A、C组骨折复位情况、临床治疗总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
      结论  改良Stoppa入路内固定与微创经骨膜外钢板内固定术治疗骨盆前环骨折较外固定治疗骨折愈合时间短,术后并发症少,骨折复位情况及临床疗效更优。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To observe the effects of internal fixation of modified Stoppa approach, external fixation and internal fixation of minimally invasive transperiosteal plate in treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures.
      Methods  Clinical data of 98 patients with anterior pelvic ring fracture was retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into group A, group B, and group C according to different treatment methods. The group A(33 cases) received modified Stoppa approach internal fixation, group B(31 cases) received external fixation of modified Stoppa approach, group C(34 cases) received minimally invasive transperiosteal plate internal fixation. Related indicators of surgery, postoperative fracture reduction conditions, clinical efficacy, and incidence of complications in the three groups were compared.
      Results  The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing time in the three groups showed statistically significant differences(P < 0.05). The fracture reduction and clinical total effective rate of groups A and C were better than those of group B (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistical significance in the fracture reduction and clinical total effective rate between groups A and C (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications among the three groups (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  Compared with external fixation, modified Stoppa approach internal fixation and minimally invasive transperiosteal plate internal fixation have shorter healing time, better fracture reduction and clinical efficacy, and fewer postoperative complications.

     

/

返回文章
返回