后颅窝快速钻孔穿刺置管引流术治疗小脑出血的效果观察

Effect of rapid puncture and drainage by indwelling tube through drilling hole of posterior cranial fossa in the treatment of cerebellar hemorrhage

  • 摘要: 目的 观察后颅窝快速钻孔穿刺置管引流术治疗小脑出血患者的效果。 方法 选取80例小脑出血患者作为研究对象,按照随机数表法分为研究组和对照组,每组40例。对照组采用传统开颅血肿清除术治疗,研究组采用后颅窝快速钻孔置管引流术治疗。比较2组患者术前血肿体积、术中出血量、手术时间、术后血肿清除时间、住院时间等手术相关指标和手术前后Barthel评分、治疗效果、术后并发症发生情况。 结果 研究组治疗效果良好率为77.5%, 高于对照组的52.5%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间、术后血肿清除时间、住院时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 2组术前血肿体积比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前, 2组Barthel评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 术后1个月, 2组Barthel评分均高于术前,且研究组Barthel评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组术后并发症发生率为7.5%, 低于对照组的32.5%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 相较于传统开颅血肿清除术,后颅窝快速钻孔置管引流术治疗小脑出血具有手术创伤小、手术时间短、治疗效果好、并发症少、患者恢复佳、对手术设备要求低等优点,易在基层医院中开展。

     

    Abstract: Objective To observe the effect of rapid puncture and drainage by indwelling tube through drilling hole of posterior cranial fossa in the treatment of cerebellar hemorrhage. Methods A total of 80 patients with cerebellar hemorrhage were selected as research objects. According to random number table method, they were divided into study group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with traditional craniotomy and hematoma clearance, while the study group was treated with rapid drainage by indwelling tube through drilling hole of posterior cranial fossa. The preoperative hematoma volume, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative hematoma clearance time, hospitalization time, Barthel score before and after operation, treatment effect and postoperative complications were recorded. Results The total good rate of the study group was 77.5%, which was significantly higher than 52.5% of the control group(P<0.05); the intraoperative blood loss was less, operation time, postoperative hematoma clearance time and hospital stay in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in preoperative hematoma volume between the two groups(P>0.05). Before operation, there was no significant difference in Barthel score between the two groups(P>0.05). At 1 month after operation, the Barthel scores of the two groups was significantly higher than operation before, and the Barthel score of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05); the incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was 7.5%, which was significantly lower than 32.5% of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared - with traditional hematoma evacuation by craniotomy, rapid puncture and drainage by indwelling tube through drilling hole of posterior cranial fossa in treating cerebellar hemorrhage has the advantages of less operation trauma, shorter operation time, less complications, better curative efficacy and recovery, and lower requirements for surgical equipment. Therefore, it is easy to carry out this project in primary hospitals.

     

/

返回文章
返回