肺上叶切除术后单胸腔引流管和双胸腔引流管的应用比较

Comparison of single thoracic drainage tube and double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy

  • 摘要: 目的 比较单根胸腔引流管与双胸腔引流管在肺上叶切除术后的应用效果。 方法 回顾性分析行上肺叶切除术的60例患者的临床资料,将其分为单胸腔引流管组(A组)和双胸腔引流管组(B组)。比较2组患者临床效果。 结果 2组术后皮下气肿、术后增加置管、拔管后再次穿刺抽气、抽液的发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组带管时间、术后住院时间短于B组,术后疼痛评分优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 肺上叶切除术后应用单胸腔引流管引流效果优于双胸腔引流管,且能缓解术后疼痛,缩短带管时间与住院时间。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare effect of single thoracic drainage tube and double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy. Methods The data of 60 patients who underwent upper pulmonary lobectomy was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into single thoracic drainage tube(A group)and double thoracic drainage tube(B group). Clinical effect in both the groups was compared. Results There were no differences in incidence rates of subcutaneous emphysema after surgery, adding catheterization after surgery, and gas and liquid aspiration by puncture after extubation between the two groups(P>0.05). The catheter-indwelling duration and postoperative hospital stay in the group A were significantly shorter than those in group B, and the postoperative pain score was significantly better than that in group B(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of single tube is better than that of double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy, and it can relieve postoperative pain, shorten the time of indwelling tube and hospital stay.

     

/

返回文章
返回