基于SEER数据库的早期食管腺癌外科手术与内镜治疗的预后比较分析

Analysis in prognosis of surgical operation versus endoscopic therapy in treating patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma based on SEER database

  • 摘要:
      目的  基于美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)癌症登记处数据库,分析内镜与外科手术治疗对肿瘤浸润深度为黏膜肌层(M3)和黏膜下层(SM)的早期食管腺癌(eEA)预后的影响。
      方法  检索并下载SEER数据库2004—2015年食管癌数据,将经纳入与排除标准筛选后的数据按不同治疗方式分为内镜组与外科手术组,将2组一般资料存在统计学差异的变量作为匹配变量进行倾向性评分匹配(PSM)以平衡组间差异。将PSM后的最终数据采用寿命表法计算中位生存时间和1、3、5年生存率,采用Kaplan-Meier法计算和绘制生存曲线,使用Log-rank检验评估各协变量分层处理后2组的生存差异。采用Cox回归模型进行单因素及多变量分析。
      结果  内镜组与外科组的总生存曲线差异无统计学意义(P=0.545)。将年龄、性别、肿瘤位置、临床分期、T分期、分化程度分层处理后,内镜组与外科手术组仅年龄≥80岁人群生存率差异有统计学意义(P=0.038)。单因素Cox分析显示,年龄(HR=2.147,95% CI为1.590~2.900,P < 0.001)、T分期(HR=2.020,95% CI为1.328~3.074,P < 0.001)与eEA患者预后显著相关;多因素Cox分析显示,年龄(HR=2.000,95% CI为1.480~2.704,P < 0.001)、T分期(HR=1.767,95% CI为1.155~2.703,P=0.009)是eEA患者预后的独立危险因素。
      结论  对于浸润深度为M3和SM的eEA患者,内镜能达到与外科手术治疗相同的预后效果,若术前排除淋巴结及远处转移,建议先行内镜治疗。建议≥80岁eEA患者行内镜治疗,高龄及T1b期eEA患者应适当追加术后放化疗。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze the influence of endoscopic and surgical treatments on the prognosis of early esophageal adenocarcinoma (eEA) patients with tumor invasion depth of muscularis mucosa (M3) and submucosa (SM) based on the cancer registry database of American Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER).
      Methods  We searched and downloaded esophageal cancer data from 2004 to 2015 in SEER database. The data screened by inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into endoscopic group and surgical group according to different treatment methods. The variables with statistical differences in general data in both groups were used as matching variables to make the tendency evaluation matching (PSM) for balance the differences between the two groups. For the final data after PSM, the median lifetime and 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were calculated by the life table method, the Kaplan-Meier was used to calculate and draw survival curve, and Log-rank test was used to evaluate the survival difference between the two groups after the stratified treatment of each covariate. The Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis.
      Results  There was no significant difference in overall survival curve between the endoscopic group and the surgical group (P=0.545). After stratified processing of age, gender, tumor location, clinical staging, T staging and degree of differentiation, there was a significant difference in survival rate in people aged 80 and above between the endoscopic group and the surgical group (P=0.038). Univariate Cox analysis showed that age (HR=2.147, 95%CI, 1.590 to 2.900, P < 0.001) and T staging (HR=2.020, 95%CI, 1.328 to 3.074, P < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the prognosis of patients with eEA. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that age (HR=2.000, 95%CI, 1.480 to 2.704, P < 0.001) and T staging (HR=1.767, 95%CI, 1.155 to 2.703, P=0.009) were independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients with eEA.
      Conclusion  For eEA patients with invasion depth of M3 and SM, endoscopic treatment can achieve the same prognosis as surgical treatment. If lymph node and distant metastasis are excluded before operation, endoscopic treatment is recommended at first. It is suggested that eEA patients aged 80 and above should be treated with endoscopy, and senile and T1b stage eEA cases should be given additional postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回