经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定与Wiltse间隙入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折患者的效果比较

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach in treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures

  • 摘要: 目的 比较经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定与Wiltse间隙入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折患者的临床效果。 方法 将30例胸腰椎骨折患者随机分为经皮组14例和Wiltse组16例,比较2组手术相关指标。比较2组术前、术后第1天、术后6个月及术后1年的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分,以及术后3、6个月及术后1年腰背部Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。比较2组术前、术后第1天、术后6个月及术后1年的伤椎椎体前缘相对高度、伤椎后凸角。比较2组并发症发生情况。 结果 2组患者均顺利完成手术,且均至少随访1年。经皮组手术时间、术中透视次数显著长于、多于Wiltse组,术中失血量显著少于Wiltse组(P<0.05)。2组患者术后第1天、术后6个月及术后1年时VAS评分均较术前显著降低(P<0.05), 且经皮组术后第1天VAS评分显著低于Wiltse组(P<0.05)。2组患者术后3、6个月及术后1年的ODI评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者术后伤椎椎体前缘相对高度均基本恢复正常,伤椎后凸角较术前均显著降低(P<0.05), 但2组各个时点比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Wiltse组发生1例切口感染(6.3%),经皮组发生1例皮下血肿(7.1%), 2组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定与Wiltse间隙入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折患者均能取得满意的临床效果,且并发症发生率较低。对于单节段且不需要椎管减压的骨折患者,应优先采取经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗; 对于多节段且不需要椎管减压的骨折患者,应选择经Wiltse入路椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach in treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Methods Totally 30 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were randomly divided into percutaneous group(n=14)and Wiltse group(n=16). The operation related indexes were compared between the two groups. The scores of Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)before operation, on the first day after operation, 6 months after operation and 1 year after operation as well as scores of waist and back Oswestry disability index(ODI)at 3, 6 months and 1 year after operation were compared between the two groups. The relative height of anterior edge of injured vertebral body and kyphosis angle of injured vertebrae were compared between the two groups before operation, on the first day after operation, 6 months after operation and 1 year after operation. The complications were compared between the two groups. Results All the patients completed the operation successfully and were followed up for at least 1 year. The operation time, intra-operative fluoroscopy times in the percutaneous group was significantly longer and more than those in the Wiltse group, and intra-operative blood loss was significantly less than that in the Wiltse group(P<0.05). The VAS scores of the two groups were significantly decreased at 1 day, 6 months and 1 year after operation(P<0.05), and the VAS score at 1 d after operation of the percutaneous group was significantly lower than that of the Wiltse - group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ODI scores between the two groups at 3, 6 months and 1 year after operation(P>0.05). After operation, the relative height of the anterior edge of injured vertebrae in the two groups returned to normal, and the kyphosis angle of injured vertebrae was significantly improved compared with operation before(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point(P>0.05). Wound infection occurred in 1 case(6.3%)in the Wiltse group and 1 case with subcutaneous hematoma(7.1%)in the percutaneous group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Both internal fixation by percutaneous pedicle screw and pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach can achieve satisfactory clinical effects in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, and have lower incidence of complication. Internal fixation by percutaneous pedicle screw should be given for single-segment fracture patients without spinal canal decompressive operation, while pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach should be given for multiple-segment fracture patients without spinal canal decompressive operation.

     

/

返回文章
返回