经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术治疗脱出型腰椎间盘突出症的效果

鞠冀东, 吴锦春, 刘岗

鞠冀东, 吴锦春, 刘岗. 经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术治疗脱出型腰椎间盘突出症的效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(4): 93-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200567
引用本文: 鞠冀东, 吴锦春, 刘岗. 经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术治疗脱出型腰椎间盘突出症的效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(4): 93-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200567
JU Jidong, WU Jinchun, LIU Gang. Effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating prolapsed lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 93-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200567
Citation: JU Jidong, WU Jinchun, LIU Gang. Effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating prolapsed lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 93-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200567

经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术治疗脱出型腰椎间盘突出症的效果

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R681.5;R61

Effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating prolapsed lumbar disc herniation

  • 摘要:
      目的  观察经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术(PTED)治疗66例脱出型腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的效果,并探讨预后影响因素。
      方法  回顾性分析66例采用PTED治疗脱出型LDH患者的临床资料,所有患者均行腰椎动力位片和核磁共振检查。记录术前及术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分,卡氏功能状态评分标准(KPS)评分及日本矫形外科学会(JOA)腰痛评分,术后随访期间记录症状缓解、复发及并发症发生情况。
      结果  术后,患者VAS评分低于术前,KPS及JOA评分高于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后并发症的发生与椎间盘突出程度相关(P < 0.05);复发型LDH患者术后更易复发(P < 0.05)。
      结论  PTED手术时间短,术中出血量及术后并发症较少,是治疗脱出型LDH的安全、有效方法。重度LDH患者应更加注意预防术后并发症的发生,复发型LDH患者在选择PTED治疗时应注意把握适应证。
    Abstract:
      Objective  To observe clinical effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in treating patients with prolapsed lumbar disc herniation (LDH), and to explore influencing factors of prognosis.
      Methods  The clinical data of 66 cases diagnosed as prolapsed LDH was retrospectively analyzed, and all of the patients underwent lumbar flexion-extension radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. The preoperative and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for lumber pain were recorded, the conditions of symptom relief, recurrence and other complications were recorded.
      Results  After surgery, VAS score was significantly lower than that before surgery, and KPS and JOA score were significantly higher than those before surgery(P < 0.05). Occurrence of postoperative complications was correlated with the degree of disc herniation (P < 0.05). Patients with prolapsed LDH were more likely to relapse after surgery (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  PTED has shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications, so it is a safe and effective surgical option in treating prolapsed LDH. Patients with severe LDH should pay more attention to the prevention of postoperative complications, and indications of patients with prolapsed LDH should be paid more attention when choosing PTED treatment.
  • [1]

    WONG D A, TRANSFELDT E. Macnab, s backache[M]. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincolt Williams&Wilkins, 2006: 78-90.

    [2]

    NELLENSTEIJN J, OSTELO R, BARTELS R, et al. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(2): 181-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1155-x

    [3]

    TONOSU J, OSHIMA Y, SHIBOI R, et al. Consideration of proper operative route for interlaminar approach for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J]. J Spine Surg, 2016, 2(4): 281-288. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.11.05

    [4]

    YEUNG A T, TSOU P M. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases[J]. Spine, 2002, 27(7): 722-731. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204010-00009

    [5]

    HOOGLAND T, VAN DEN BREKEL-DIJKSTRA K, SCHUBERT M, et al. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(9): 973-978. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8ade

    [6]

    LEE S H, CHUNG S E, AHN Y, et al. Comparative radiologic evaluation of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open microdiscectomy: a matched cohort analysis[J]. Mt Sinai J Med, 2006(73): 795-801.

    [7]

    WILSON C A, ROFFEY D M, CHOW D, et al. A systematic review of preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcomes following lumbar discectomy[J]. Spine J, 2016, 16(11): 1413-1422. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.003

    [8]

    PUVANESARAJAH V, HASSANZADEH H. The true cost of a dural tear: medical and economic ramifications of incidental durotomy during lumbar discectomy in elderly medicare beneficiaries[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42(10): 770-776. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001895

  • 期刊类型引用(16)

    1. 王素,荆怡. 医护一体化精准护理对先天性白内障患儿术后康复及家属护理工作满意度的影响. 临床研究. 2022(02): 174-177 . 百度学术
    2. 刘红霞. 优质护理对高龄白内障人工晶体植入术患者护理质量及患者满意度的影响. 透析与人工器官. 2022(01): 79-81 . 百度学术
    3. 陆沸. 人工晶体植入联合超声乳化治疗白内障护理中临床护理路径的应用效果研究. 医学食疗与健康. 2022(07): 144-147 . 百度学术
    4. 舒宁波,何修运,蒯春玲,缪迎霞. 围术期路径式精细化护理模式在白内障病人护理中的应用. 全科护理. 2022(31): 4436-4439 . 百度学术
    5. 曲华卿. 右美托咪定复合丙美卡因表面麻醉在老年白内障超声乳化人工晶体植入患者中的应用. 江西医药. 2022(10): 1476-1478 . 百度学术
    6. 聂冬丽. 临床护理路径在白内障超声乳化治疗患者中的应用. 国际护理学杂志. 2021(10): 1832-1835 . 百度学术
    7. 潘小姣. 对接受白内障手术的老年患者进行综合护理的效果探究. 当代医药论丛. 2020(02): 260-261 . 百度学术
    8. 牛卓娅,张春,朱景瑞. 中西医结合护理干预白内障超声乳化吸出术及人工晶状体植入术后临床研究. 新中医. 2020(05): 182-185 . 百度学术
    9. 胡丹丹. 临床护理路径在眼科白内障患者护理中的临床应用. 心理月刊. 2020(13): 128 . 百度学术
    10. 冯莎莎. 临床护理路径对老年COPD合并重度CO_2潴留患者护理效果的影响. 中国老年保健医学. 2020(03): 136-138 . 百度学术
    11. 刘佳凤,张芮,孟迪,周玲. 临床护理路径在人工晶体植入联合超声乳化治疗白内障患者中的应用效果. 中国当代医药. 2020(15): 223-225 . 百度学术
    12. 陈莹,刘红霞,朱婧. 临床护理路径对行超声乳化联合人工晶体植入白内障患者康复进程及生活质量的影响. 透析与人工器官. 2020(03): 106-108 . 百度学术
    13. 刘秋亭. 在骨关节护理治疗中应用临床护理路径的效果. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志. 2020(27): 87+89 . 百度学术
    14. 朱德玲. 整体护理对老年性白内障患者的影响分析. 中国继续医学教育. 2019(14): 190-192 . 百度学术
    15. 黄庆红. 临床护理路径在人工晶体植入联合超声乳化治疗白内障中的应用. 长江大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(06): 105-107 . 百度学术
    16. 沈卉. 老年性白内障患者围手术期的优质护理体会. 中国继续医学教育. 2018(31): 162-164 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(0)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量: 
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 16
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-11-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-03-14
  • 发布日期:  2021-02-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回