脑室外引流联合开颅血肿清除治疗脑出血破入脑室的疗效观察

Effect observation of extraventricular drainage combined with clearance of hematoma by craniotomy in treatment of patients with cerebral hemorrhage rupturing into ventricle

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析脑室外引流联合开颅血肿清除治疗脑出血破入脑室的疗效。
      方法  选取95例脑出血破入脑室患者,随机分为对照组30例与观察组65例。对照组采用脑室外引流术,观察组采用脑室外引流联合开颅血肿清除术。比较2组疗效、临床指标及并发症。
      结果  观察组总有效率89.23%, 显著高于对照组73.33%(P < 0.05)。观察组术后残余血肿量显著少于对照组,而手术时间、住院时间显著长于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组改良Rankin量表(MRS)评分、神经功能缺损评分显著低于对照组,而格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)则显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组并发症发生率3.08%, 显著低于对照组16.66%(P < 0.05)。
      结论  脑室外引流联合开颅血肿清除术对脑出血破入脑室患者效果显著,可显著减少术后残余血肿量,降低并发症发生率。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the effect of extraventricular drainage combined with clearance of hematoma by craniotomy in treatment of patients with cerebral hemorrhage rupturing into ventricle.
      Methods  Totally 95 patients with cerebral hemorrhage rupturing into ventricle were selected and randomly divided into control group (n=30) and observation group (n=65). The control group was treated with extraventricular drainage, while the observation group was treated with extraventricular drainage and clearance of hematoma by craniotomy. The curative effect, clinical indexes and complications were compared between two groups.
      Results  The total effective rate of the observation group was 89.23%, which was significantly higher than 73.33% of the control group (P < 0.05). The amount of residual hematoma in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group, while the operation time and hospitalization were significantly longer than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The modified Rankin Scale (MRS) score and neurological deficit score in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, while the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence rate of complications in the observation group was 3.08%, which was significantly lower than 16.66% in the control group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Extraventricular drainage combined with clearance of hematoma by craniotomy is effective in treatment of patients with cerebral hemorrhage rupturing into ventricle, which can significantly reduce the amount of residual hematoma after operation and the incidence of complications.

     

/

返回文章
返回