不同黏度骨水泥椎体成形术治疗椎体骨坏死的疗效比较

Effect comparison of vertebroplasty with bone cement of different viscosity for the treatment of vertebral osteonecrosis

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨采用高黏度骨水泥或低黏度骨水泥椎体成形术治疗椎体骨坏死患者的临床效果及并发症发生情况。
      方法  将32例椎体骨坏死患者随机分为高黏度组15例及低黏度组17例, 记录术中透视次数、手术时间及骨水泥注射量,手术前后采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分评估腰背部疼痛,功能障碍指数(ODI)评分评估腰背部功能,简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)评分评估生活质量,影像学测量伤椎椎体相对高度(%)、伤椎后凸畸形角度,同时观察骨水泥渗漏及临近节段椎体骨折等并发症发生情况。
      结果  2组患者均手术顺利,完成至少12个月随访; 2组患者一般情况、术中透视次数、手术时间及骨水泥注射量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 与手术前比较, 2组患者手术后VAS评分及ODI评分显著降低, SF-36评分显著提高,伤椎椎体前缘高度(%)及伤椎椎体中部高度(%)显著改善,后凸畸形角度显著改善(P < 0.05), 但2组间同一时点及组内术后不同时点无显著差异(P>0.05); 术后X线检查发现骨水泥渗漏情况为高黏度组5个椎体(33.3%), 均为椎间盘内渗漏,低黏度组10个椎体(58.8%), 其中8个椎间盘内渗漏、2个为椎旁渗漏,2组渗漏率有显著差异(P < 0.05)。
      结论  采用椎体成形术治疗椎体骨坏死可达到满意的临床效果,而应用高黏度骨水泥行椎体成形术可显著降低术后骨水泥渗漏率,提升手术安全性。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To compare the clinical outcomes of high- and low-viscosity cement percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of vertebral osteonecrosis and its complications.
      Methods  Thirty-two patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral osteonecrosis were randomly assigned into high-viscosity group(n=15) and low-viscosity group(n=17). Intraoperative X-ray times, operative time and volume of bone cement injection were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36), and radiographic measurement were performed to assess waist-back pain, waist-back function and life quality, relative height of injured vertebrae(%) and its kyphotic angle, respectively. Incidence of complications such as bone cement leakage and vertebral fractures in adjacent segments were observed.
      Results  The patients in both groups had smooth operation and completed follow-up for at least 12 months. There was no significant difference in the general data, intraoperative X-ray times, operation time and volume of bone cement injection between the two groups (P>0.05). Significant improvement on the VAS, ODI scores, SF-36 score, vertebral height (%) and kyphosis Cobb′s angle were noted in each group compared with treatment before. However, there were no significant differences in the same postoperative time between the 2 groups and at varied time points intra-group(P>0.05). Postoperative X-ray assessment identified cement leakage occurred in 5 vertebrae(33.3%) in high viscosity group, and all of them were intraspinal leakage, while high-viscosity cement group had 10 vertebrae leakage(58.8%), among which 8 was intraspinal leakage, 2 was vertebral side leakage. There were significant differences between the two groups in cement leakage rate(P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  PVP used in osteoporotic vertebral osteonecrosis has better clinical efficacy, which can significantly relieve back pain, improve lower back function and quality of life. Furthermore, high-viscosity cement can reduce the cement leakage rate and greatly enhance operative safety.

     

/

返回文章
返回