凶险型前置胎盘髂内动脉封堵与腹主动脉球囊封堵术的临床效果比较

Effect comparison between internal iliac artery occlusion and balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta in treatment of patients with pernicious placenta previa

  • 摘要: 目的 比较凶险型前置胎盘术前采用髂内动脉球囊置管暂时封堵术与腹主动脉球囊暂时封堵术的临床效果.方法 选取凶险型前置胎盘患者126例并分为2组,比较2组治疗效果.结果 2组患者在出血量、子宫切除率、胎儿射线接触时间、接触量、剖宫产时间、术后并发症、住院时间、术后子宫动脉栓塞率等方面比较有显著差异(P<0.05).结论 在凶险型前置胎盘患者介入治疗中,腹主动脉球囊置管暂时封堵更具优越性.

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical effect of internal iliac artery occlusion and balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta in treatment of patients with pernicious placenta previa.Methods A total of 126 patients with pernicious placenta previa were selected and divided into two groups,and the effect was compared between two groups.Results There were significant differences between the two groups in the amount of bleeding,the rate of hysterectomy,the exposure time,the amount of contact,the time of cesarean section,postoperative complications,length of stay,and the rate of uterine artery embolization (P < 0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of patients with pernicious placenta previa,balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta is much better.

     

/

返回文章
返回