雷替曲塞联合奥沙利铂与FOLFOX4方案治疗中晚期原发性肝癌的疗效评价

Clinical efficacy of raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin and FOLFOX 4 protocol in treatment of patients with middle and advanced primary liver cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨雷替曲塞联合奥沙利铂(RALOX方案)与5-氟尿嘧啶+亚叶酸钙+奥沙利铂(FOLFOX 4方案)对中晚期原发性肝癌(PLC)的疗效及药物毒性反应.方法 选取72例中晚期PLC患者,随机分为RALOX组(n=34)与FOLFOX4组(n=38).化疗后每6周评价客观疗效,观察客观缓解率(OR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、中位生存期(mOS)、中位无进展生存期(mPFS)、1年存活率(SR)及毒副反应.结果 RALOX组可评价31例,OR为19.4%,DCR为51.6%,mOS为7.2个月,mPFS为3.4个月,1年SR为22.6%;FOLFOX 4方案组可评价29例,OR为13.8%,DCR为48.3%,mOS为6.9个月,mPFS为3.3个月,1年SR为20.7%,2组差异无有统计学意义(P>0.05).RALOX组消化道反应、肝毒性、心脏毒性、外周神经毒性及手足综合征的发生率均低于FOLFOX 4组,肾毒性、骨髓抑制的发生率2组相当.结论 RALOX方案应用于中晚期PLC患者安全有效,疗效不劣于FOLFOX 4方案且副反应较轻.

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and drug-toxic reactions of raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin (RALOX protocol) and 5-fluorouracil + calciumfolinate + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX 4 protocol) in the treatment of patients with middle and advanced primary liver cancer (PLC).Methods A total of 72 patients with PLC were selected and randomly divided into RALOX group (n =34) and FOLFOX 4 group (n =38).The objective response rate (RR) was evaluated every 6 weeks after chemotherapy,while objective remission rate (OR),disease-control rate (DCR),median survival rate (mOS),median progression-free survival (mPFS),1-year survival rate (SR) as well as toxic and adverse reactions were observed.Results In RALOX group,31 patients were evaluable,with OR,DCR,mOS,mPFS,and 1-year SR being 19.4%,51.6%,7.2 months,3.4 months,and 22.6%,respectively.In FOLFOX 4 group,29 patients were evaluable,with OR,DCR,mOS,mPFS,and 1-year SR being 13.8%,48.3%,6.9 months,3.3 months and 20.7%,respectively.RALOX group was significantly lower than FOLFOX 4 group in the incidence rates of gastrointestinal reactions,liver toxicity,cardiac toxicity,peripheral nervous toxicity and hand-foot syndrome,but there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of renal toxicity and myelosuppression between two groups.Conclusion RALOX is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with middle and advanced PLC,and is superior to FOLFOX 4 protocol in clinical efficacy with mild adverse reactions.

     

/

返回文章
返回