不同口腔护理时机对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果的影响研究

刘欢

刘欢. 不同口腔护理时机对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果的影响研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, (6): 101-103,110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201706031
引用本文: 刘欢. 不同口腔护理时机对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果的影响研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, (6): 101-103,110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201706031
LIU Huan. Effects of different timing of oral care on nursing efficacy of ventilator-associated pneumonia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (6): 101-103,110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201706031
Citation: LIU Huan. Effects of different timing of oral care on nursing efficacy of ventilator-associated pneumonia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (6): 101-103,110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201706031

不同口腔护理时机对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果的影响研究

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R473.78

Effects of different timing of oral care on nursing efficacy of ventilator-associated pneumonia

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨不同口腔护理时机对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果的影响.方法 选择接受机械通气的120例危重患者,随机分为A组、B组、对照组.对照组患者给予每12h1次的常规口腔护理,A组患者实施8h1次的口腔护理,B组患者行5h1次的口腔护理.观察3组患者干预后早期、延期及总VAP发生率,比较3组患者VAP发生时间、口腔并发症发生率,分析3者患者机械通气时间、住院时间以及病死率.结果 经过护理干预,A组与B组患者的早期VAP发生率、延期VAP发生率及总VAP发生率均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),A组与B组患者之间的以上3项指标差异不显著(P>0.05);A组与B组患者的VAP发生时间及各种并发症的发生率均显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).A组与B组患者的VAP发生时间差异不显著(P>0.05),但A组患者的并发症的发生率高于B组(P<0.05);B组患者的机械通气时间、住院时间以及病死率均显著低于A组患者与对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),A组患者的以上3项指标均显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 不同口腔护理时机对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果不同,能够缩短口腔护理周期时间,显著改善呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果,5h1次的口腔护理对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果影响最大,值得在临床推广.
    Abstract: Objective To explore the impact of different timing of oral care on nursing efficacy of ventilator-associated pneumonia.Methods A total of 129 critically ill patients during mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into group A,group B and control group,with 40 cases per group.The control group was treated with routine oral care every 12 h,A group for eight hours,group B for five hours.Early,delayed and overall incidence of VAP were compared in three groups,VAP occurrence time,the incidence of oral complications were observed,and mechanical ventilation,length of hospital stay and mortality were compared.Results After nursing intervention,early,delayed and overall incidence of VAP of group A and group B were significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05),but VAP time between A group and B showed no significant differences (P > 0.05);The occurrence of complications in A group were significantly better than that of the control group(P <0.05).Duration of mechanical ventilation,length of stay and mortality of B group were shorter than A group and control group (P < 0.05),above three indicators of group A were significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05).Conclusion Effects of oral care timing of ventilator-associated pneumonia care are different,the three nursing methods can shorten oral care cycle time,significantly improve nursing effect of ventilator-associated pneumonia,but 5 h oral care has the best nursing efficacy,and it is worthy of clinical practice.
  • 期刊类型引用(14)

    1. 刘升. ICU中呼吸机相关性肺炎影响因素及预防措施研究进展. 中国乡村医药. 2020(16): 78-80 . 百度学术
    2. 郑秀榕,郭艳梅. 碳酸氢钠口腔护理干预预防ICU住院患者口腔感染的效果探析. 中外医学研究. 2019(08): 82-84 . 百度学术
    3. 欧阳欣. 口腔护理改善气管插管机械通气患者口腔菌落情况的效果观察. 四川生理科学杂志. 2019(01): 40-42 . 百度学术
    4. 石红影. 呼吸机相关肺炎护理中不同口腔护理对于护理效果的影响分析. 全科口腔医学电子杂志. 2019(14): 86+88 . 百度学术
    5. 张婷,刘慧敏,黄叶香,张丽娜,袁悦,杨静. 牙膏联合刷牙法对昏迷鼻饲患者口腔护理的影响. 中国卫生标准管理. 2019(12): 133-135 . 百度学术
    6. 张致英,张晓英,丁玉兰. 不同口腔护理方法预防呼吸机相关性肺炎效果比较. 西北国防医学杂志. 2019(09): 544-548 . 百度学术
    7. 吉淑娟. 不同口腔护理时机对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果的影响分析. 临床研究. 2019(11): 177-178 . 百度学术
    8. 曾巧红,张华英,杨素芳. 冲洗式口护吸痰术在危重患者中的应用. 护理实践与研究. 2018(16): 127-129 . 百度学术
    9. 吴静. 临床口腔护理的现状认识与进展. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2018(42): 43+71 . 百度学术
    10. 刘珊. 探讨不同口腔护理时机对呼吸机相关肺炎护理效果的影响. 全科口腔医学电子杂志. 2018(29): 98+100 . 百度学术
    11. 沈锦霞,李月飞,毛根军. 集束化护理在胸部肿瘤放疗患者中的应用效果分析. 中国慢性病预防与控制. 2018(11): 858-861 . 百度学术
    12. 崔梅,柳小霞. 对接受气管插管机械通气的患者进行不同频率的口腔护理在降低其VAP发生率方面的效果. 当代医药论丛. 2018(24): 222-223 . 百度学术
    13. 夏立平,秦阳,韦小梅,叶文琴. 口腔护理液选择与应用研究进展. 中国医药科学. 2017(21): 34-39 . 百度学术
    14. 杨晓玲,董晓霞,张燕. 集束化护理措施对预防新生儿呼吸机相关性肺炎的观察. 中国实用医药. 2017(28): 186-188 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  261
  • HTML全文浏览量:  85
  • PDF下载量:  15
  • 被引次数: 18
出版历程

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回