临床护理路径对PCI术后冠心病患者的应用效果研究

Application effect of clinical nursing pathway for coronary heart disease patients with percutaneous coronary intervention

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨临床护理路径对PCI术后冠心病患者的应用效果.方法 将本院90例PCI术后冠心病患者作为研究对象,按照随机数表法分为观察组和对照组各45例.对照组患者实施传统护理模式遵循医嘱给予护理,观察组患者实施临床护理路径.治疗后,分析比较两组患者的应用效果.结果 观察组患者心律失常并发症发生率(2.22%)显著低于对照组(13.33%),比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);而观察组患者心衰、心源性休克并发症发生率虽有所降低,但与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者经治疗后的切口疼痛、腹胀、腰酸背痛评分分别为(1.56±1.32)分、(10.27±1.46)分、(1.34±0.97)分低于对照组(2.69±1.43)分、(16.18±2.25)分、(1.89±1.21)分,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后满意度(95.56%)显著高于对照组(82.22%),比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的卧床时间、住院时间以及住院费用分别为(59.48 ±5.12)h、(6.43±2.26)d、(4.89±0.18)万元均短于或少于对照组(69.13±6.27)h、(9.15-±2.68)d、(5.27-±0.16)万元,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组护理表格书写、基础护理、介入护理评分分别为(92.47±4.58)分、(93.49±3.91)分、(94.09±5.17)分均优于对照组(87.19±3.72)分、(88.62 ±4.29)分、(90.26±3.93)分,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 临床护理路径疗对PCI术后冠心病患者的应用效果良好,能够减少术后并发症,缩短卧床时间和住院时间,提高患者满意度和综合护理质量.

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate effect of clinical nursing pathway for coronary heart disease patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods A total of 90 coronary heart disease patients with PCI in our hospital were divided into observation group and control group according to random number table method,with 45 cases per group.Patients in the control group were given traditional care,while observation group was given clinical nursing pathway.After treatment,the application effects of two groups were compared.Results The incidence of arrhythmia in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.22% vs.13.33%,P < 0.05),and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).The incidence of heart failure and cardiogenic shock in the observation group was decreased,but there was no significant difference between two groups(P >0.05).Incision pain,abdominal distension,back pain score were (1.56 ± 1.32),(10.27 ± 1.46),(1.34 ± 0.97),which were significantly lower than (2.69 ± 1.43),(16.18 ± 2.25),(1.89 ± 1.21),respectively,in the control group (P < 0.05).After treatment,satisfaction of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (95.56% vs.82.22%,P <0.05).Bedridden time,length of stay and hospital costs in the observation group were (59.48 ± 5.12)h,(6.43 ± 2.26)d,(4.89 ± 0.18)ten thousand RMB,which were shorter orless than (69.13 ± 6.27) h,(9.15 ± 2.68) d,(5.27 ± 0.16) ten thousand RMB in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.0 5).Nursing form writing,basic nursing,nursing intervention scores in the observation group were (92.47 ± 4.58),(93.49 ±3.91),(94.09 ±5.17),which were higher than (87.19 ±3.72),(88.62 ±4.29),(90.26 ± 3.93) of the control group,the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusion Clinical nursing pathway after PCI can reduce complications,shorten bedridden time and hospitalization time,and improve patients'satisfaction and overall nursing quality.

     

/

返回文章
返回